"Freedom or Islam? - Dare to Choose"
Belgian MP Filip Dewinter: "We Need to Organise Resistance Against Islamisation".(IVE).Filip Dewinter, the leader of Vlaams Belang in Antwerp, has been a member of
parliament since 13 December 1987. He is currently the head of the group in the
Flemish parliament and a senator. Filip Dewinter is also the European president
of the association “Cities Against Islamisation”. The Vérités Bruxelloises [True
Brusselites] wanted to know more.
Vérités Bruxelloises: You once said you
were an a islamophobe and you would declare yourself as such. Do you still
maintain that?
Filip Dewinter: You’re quoting my book Inch’ Allah, the
Islamisation of Europe where I write that Islamophobia is the duty of every
person. Yes, indeed. Islam makes me afraid. Islam is a religion of conquest and
totalitarianism and wants to dominate the entire world. It is naive to take
Islam as a religion like the others. Islam is, first of all, a dangerous
political ideology. In my view, therefore, Islam is genuinely to be
feared.
V.B.: You founded and you are the president of the association
“Cities against Islamisation”. Where are you with that? What initiatives have
you taken? Have you had successes?
FDW: “Cities Against Islamisation”
(CAI) is a partnership organisation of political parties, associations and
individuals with the goal of taking specific action against the Islamisation of
Europe. In recent years, CAI has carried out actions opposing the construction
of new mega-mosques in Cologne, Milan, Paris, Antwerp and Berlin. It is
imperative to work together at the European level if we want to push back Islam.
Islam is spreading across all of Europe. We need to organise the resistance. CAI
wants to coordinate things. I’ll give you an example: a few weeks ago, we were
able to prevent a Hizb ut-Tahrir in Hasselt, thanks to information we provided
to the Austrian branch of CAI. If Islam is organised globally, we need to at
least give a European structure to the anti-jihad movement.
V.B.: The
Islamophobes are accused of racism. I know Islam isn’t a race but for some
people, is there not a base of racism beneath the islamophobia?
FDW:
Criticising Islam is no different from criticising an ideology or political
doctrine. If you can criticise liberalism, communism or nationalism, it must
always be possible to criticise Islam. I repeat: before anything Islam is a
political ideology, rather than a religion. But even if Islam was only a
religion it should still be allowed to criticise it. People who criticise Islam
are called racist in an attempt to shut them up.
V.B.: In your view is
Islam compatible with democracy and our western values (and also universal
ones)?
FDW: No, Islam and democracy are not compatible. Islam is the
antithesis of democratic. Why? From the simple fact that Islam is a theocracy.
All truth comes from Allah. The Muslim must submit the democratic laws of a
country to the will of Allah - inch’ Allah-, as described by Mohammed in the
Koran. Islam is not compatible with our western values either. Religious
freedom, the separation of the church and state, freedom of expression, equality
of expression, equality of the sexes… are values Islam doesn’t believe in. Islam
therefore constitutes a grave menace to our standards and values, our way of
life.
V.B.: Do you think that Islam can evolve? Indeed, we often hear
talk of an “Enlightened Islam”. Do you think that’s serious?
FDW: This
“Enlightened Islam” is an invention of progressive and leftist Europeans who
embrace Islam through their multiculturalism. Anyone who believes in an
“Enlightened Islam” is naive and hasn’t understood Islam at all. An Islam called
enlightened would no longer have anything to do with Islam itself. Others hope
that by means of subsidies, official recognition, setting up schools for imams
and all sorts of concessions to Islam a kind of “Euro Islam” will be created.
Let’s not delude ourselves. The only result of a policy of pampering Islam will
be the creation of a true pillar of Islam which will not be a “Euro-Islam” but
an Islamic and islamised Europe.
V.B.: Is not the principal force of
Islam in Europe the ignorance of the citizens? They place Islam at the same
level as other religions because they do not know the exact nature of the
Islamic religion, but also the political project of world domination. To fight
against Islamisation, do we not need to inform citizens about the reality of
Islam? An American author said that we needed to “get out of our small cultural
boxes”. How can we succeed in doing that and succeed in “enlightening” our
European compatriots about the reality of Islam?
FDW: Quite simply, in
our struggle against Islamisation, a raising of consciousness and a spread of
awareness are essential. We need to expose the true nature of Islam. You would
think that everyone has forgotten that, already twice before, Islam tried to
seize hold of Europe. Thanks to the major military victories of Poitiers (732)
and Vienna (1683), each time we succeeded in repulsing Islam, driving it back to
its place, which is to say on the other side of the Mediterranean. Islam wants
to make itself master of Europe again, no longer by military means, but by
immigration invasion. CAI wants to spread information about the true face of
Islam via publications, conferences and the internet
http://www.citiesagainstislamisation.org/). For example there is a free brochure
“Survival guide in an Islamic society” where in ten lessons I explain the
consequences that a European living in an Islamised district might have to
endure.
V.B.: What specific measures do you advocate to fight against
the Islamisation of Europe? Do you think that an evolution, particularly of
European governments, towards a less “favourable” view of Islam is
possible?
FDW: First of all, European governments must get rid of their
naivety and recognise the true nature of Islam. We must dare to say that Islam
has no place on European soil. In other words, recognising and subsidising
Islam, constructing mosques and minarets and Koranic schools is stupid and even
dangerous. Many politicians collaborate with Islam for electoral reasons. This
collaboration with Islam is going to blow up in our faces one day. Islam is
trying to set up its pillar. The mosques in our large cities are the
bridgeheads, the advance guards of the Islamic army whose sole objective is to
sweep down on us without mercy.
V.B.: Your colleague, the senator Anke
Van dermeersch, on behalf of the CAI created the association “Women against
Islamisation” [multilingual site]. What are its aims?
FDW: Women are the
first victims of Islamisation, as proved by the daily reality in many Muslim
countries. Islam discriminates against and humiliates women. The women is
subordinate to the man and is largely deprived of rights within Islam. It’s
simple: Allah doesn’t like women. In Islam, women are disposable, without
rights. It’s precisely for that reason that we need to warn and mobilise women.
They will be the first ones affected by Islamisation.
With “Women against
Islamisation”, we are conducting a major campaign on the theme “Islam or
freedom, dare to choose”. This campaign is on display in the “burka-bikini”
image, which my daughter appears in. This emblematic image, as well as the book
“Neither prostitute, nor Slave” which Anke Van dermeersch has just published, should
inspire debate about the rights of women in Islam.
V.B.: Mr Dewinter, we
thank you for this interview and wish you lots of courage in your noble
struggle.Read the full story here.
No comments:
Post a Comment