Showing posts with label Canadian Oil sands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canadian Oil sands. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Iran Says Higher Global Oil Prices Essential, signals willingness to cooperate with OPEC.


Iran Says Higher Global Oil Prices Essential, signals willingness to cooperate with OPEC. (IFPnews).

In a telephone conversation with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on Monday, Rouhani commended the stance adopted by Caracas at an extraordinary meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in Algeria in favor of maintaining Iran’s oil quota and raising its oil output to pre-sanctions levels.

All must make efforts so that the committee of experts would take decisions to clear the way for increasing global oil price in the [OPEC] meeting in November,” the Iranian president said, adding that OPEC countries must hold “serious negotiations” with non-OPEC producers in order to increase and stabilize oil prices at international markets.

He also called for expert-level meetings to determine member countries’ oil export quotas.

OPEC members agreed during their extraordinary meeting in Algiers, Algeria, on Wednesday to limit production in an effort to raise the low crude prices. They decided to cut production by 750,000 barrels a day.

Iran, however, has been exempted from the decision because of its exceptional situation of having been under sanctions for a number of years.

Since the removal of nuclear-related sanctions targeting its oil industry in February, Iran – which is OPEC’s third largest producer after Saudi Arabia and Iraq – has been boosting production in order to reach previous levels and has rejected calls on the country to freeze production as unfair.

Iran, whose production has reached 3.6 million barrels per day, insists on its right to increase its crude output to around 4.1-4.2 million barrels per day.

OPEC is yet to decide on how much each country should produce during its next meeting in Vienna in November.

Non-OPEC producers including Russia will also be invited to join the deal.


The Venezuelan president, for his part, said Tehran and Caracas have common and coordinated stances on regional and international developments, particularly on OPEC-related issues. Hmmm.....as i always said once Iran reaches pre sanction level of production they will talk, now who is willing to abandon part of his market?

Thursday, July 16, 2015

How the plunging price of oil has started killing off the US Oil production.


How the plunging price of oil has started killing off the US Oil production. (Alwasat).


In the previous six months, Hamm, founder of oil giant Continental Resources, had lost $6.5 billion, more than one-third of his net worth. The industry that Hamm had helped create was facing its greatest test in a frantic race to stay profitable as rival Saudi Arabia worked to drive down oil prices and, according to some analysts, undermine America's oil industry at the most important moment in its history.

Behind the low price of a gallon of gas at the pump this summer lies a competition worth trillions of dollars and which is capable of swinging the geopolitical balance of power. On one side are Hamm, a famous wildcatter, and other American oilmen who rode the discovery of hydraulic fracturing to tens of billions of dollars of wealth and a promise of, in Hamm's words, ending the "disastrous" days of Saudi Arabian control. On the other are the Saudis and their allies in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, which are trying to stem rising U.S. oil power and maintain their 40 years of dominance.

On Tuesday, the cost of West Texas Intermediate oil, a U.S. benchmark, fell to $52.11 a barrel -- down from about $110 over the past year. Meanwhile, the number operating oil rigs in the country has fallen to just 645. That was lowest rig count in almost five years, down from more than 1,500 a year ago. OPEC said last month that it would continue to pump 30 million barrels a day, despite low prices, sending a strong signal to U.S. competitors that it had no plans to let up the pressure on the Americans.

Nearly a year into the oil contest, senior players in oil capitals from Riyadh to Houston are making risky bets about their next moves. Riyadh is continuing to pump, even as that puts its own petro economy on shakier footing.

For the U.S., the risk is that sustained cheaper energy prices will derail what had seemed only months ago like an inexorable energy revolution, one that was helping to power a still-recovering economy.

"A tidal wave scenario," Ryan Lance, chairman and chief executive of ConocoPhillips, said in Houston, describing the forces that were challenging producers across the world. "The industry is in a bit of survival mode."

Hamm's company, renamed as Continental Resources, grew into an oil giant over less than a decade thanks to new but pricey drilling technology that opened access to a previously out-of-reach bounty. "Thank God we had good oil prices," Hamm said at a Continental event last September, with oil at $97 per barrel.

"One time everybody was looking at the sunset of the [American oil] industry," Hamm said. "We've seen America driven to a new era, if you will."

But the price collapse has put the United States' — and Continental's — continued rise in doubt.

Since last fall, U.S. drillers have shuttered 60 percent of their rigs, seen share prices tumble with little recovery, and laid off tens of thousands of workers who might not return even if prices were to recover. Only a handful of companies have so far faced questions about their solvency, but they have been furiously cutting projects that are no longer viable. The pullback has been severe enough to slow down the broader U.S. economy, which for years had been powered by oil job growth and investment.

"There was an irrational expectation that the market for U.S. oil was unlimited," said Michael Levi, an energy specialist at the Council on Foreign Relations. "It led to a lot of ill-advised investment."

The oil prices of the previous years — $111 per barrel in 2012; $108 per barrel in 2013 — had helped Continental grow at a breakneck pace. In early September 2014, Continental stock hit $80 per share, and Hamm, who owned 68 percent of those shares, was worth more than Rupert Murdoch.

But then prices started to fold.

The downward slide has left Continental particularly vulnerable because Hamm bet wrong on what would happen in the oil market. As oil began its slide in early November, Hamm believed that oil had reached its "bottom rung." So he sold off Continental's hedges, netting $433 million in cash while losing his assurances that he could sell oil at a fixed price.

The company, in industry parlance, was "going naked," fully exposed to the markets. Then, on the day after Thanksgiving, OPEC held a meeting in which the Saudis determined that they'd no longer work to balance the market. Though Hamm perhaps saw that part coming, what he didn't foresee was how the markets would react: They freaked out.

"In hindsight, it was not the right decision," said Leo Mariani, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets who follows the energy industry.

Continental declined to make Hamm or other executives available for comment to describe company decision-making, but responded to several questions by e-mail.

Warren Henry, Continental's vice president of investor relations and research, said by e-mail that "no one anticipated the rapidity of the price drop, in part because it was based on price-cutting actions by OPEC members rather than supply/demand fundamentals alone."

Continental is a much different — and smaller — company than it was a year ago. It's pressured suppliers to lower their costs and has fewer rigs in fewer places. In the Bakken formation that made Continental famous, operations were once spread across eight counties. Now, Continental works only in a tight cluster where oil is cheapest to come by.

"Last year, I could sit on my deck and count 60 trucks in an hour," said Jean Nygaard, a Divide County resident who leases her farmland to Continental. "Now, I can drive to work 28 miles and not see a vehicle."

Today, the U.S. oil industry is trying to feel out what will happen next. Some figure an increase in oil prices has already been set in motion, triggered by the fact that so many companies have cut down on searching for the next place to drill. Without exploration, companies can maintain production for one or two years. But not for a half-decade.

Hamm has come to interpret the events of the last half-year as a sign of U.S. oil's staying power. Continental lost $33 million in the first three months of 2015, but Hamm says the company will be able to tread water for the rest of the year — and quickly ramp up if oil prices touch $70, something he says "could happen fairly soon."

"We are adapting well to the new price environment," Hamm said. "It's a great time to be in the American oil business," he added. "America will again be an energy superpower."
Hmmm......In one year when Iran dumps it's full potential on the market it will kill off any U.S. shale oil companies left. Then it only has to wait for the right time to close the Strait of Hormuz. The Obama 'admin' has just sold the rope with which the Iranians will hang the U.S. Read the full story here.

Thursday, November 27, 2014

OPEC no longer rules supreme. America now produces more oil than Saudi Arabia....but for how long?


OPEC no longer rules supreme. America now produces more oil than Saudi Arabia....but for how long?

OPEC, the cartel which controls 40% of world oil output, met in Vienna today.

It faces a dilemma. OPEC’s poorer members, whose oil is generally costly to extract, want to cut output to prop up prices—now at four-year lows. Richer ones, who have lower costs, prefer to keep pumping and maintain their market share. OPEC no longer rules supreme: America now produces more oil than Saudi Arabia, and other non-members such as Russia and Mexico sometimes gain from OPEC’s decisions. A failure to agree on output cuts will send the price tumbling further.

OPEC Leaves Production Target Unchanged.

VIENNA—OPEC members agreed on Thursday to stick to the oil-producer group’s existing output target—a move that would require modest cuts in production but which stops well short of the stronger action some members had called for to bolster prices.

The oil producer group’s decision led to a further sharp selloff in major global oil benchmarks, with U.S. markets closed for the Thanksgiving holiday. 

Brent crude fell about 6% to below $73, a four-year low, while the West Texas Intermediate benchmark was down 3.2% to $71.36 a barrel.

Currencies of countries that are major oil producers slid, with the Canadian dollar down 0.4% against the U.S. dollar and the Russian ruble off 0.4% against the euro. 

Share prices of major oil companies also fell, with Royal Dutch Shell PLC down 3%, Total SA off 2.9% and BP falling 2%.


Shale oil is obtained through the costly technical process known as fracking, which Leschus said only becomes profitable when the price lies above $80 or $90 per barrel. Hmmmm.....The Arabs will play it hard, US Shale gas and Canadian oil sands need a higher Oil price to be sustainable, so expect higher prices.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Canadian Gasoline prices spike before Easter weekend, here's WHY!





Canadian Gasoline prices spike before Easter weekend, here's WHY!(Yahoo).Canadians woke up to spiking gasoline costs this morning, with prices reaching 140.1 cents a litre in Toronto and 147.9 in Montreal. That's about eight per cent higher than a year ago, even though crude oil prices are lower. Crude for May delivery fell $1.05 to $102.95 US a barrel Wednesday morning on the New York Mercantile Exchange. A year ago, crude was trading at $104 a barrel. Gas price watcher Dan McTeague says the oil industry usually tries to explain the increase by saying it's to cover the cost of converting from winter to summer fuel. But McTeague, a former Liberal member of Parliament and a harsh critic of the oil industry who runs the website Tomorrow's Gas Price Today, calls that a "lame and well-worn excuse." He says fuel specifications in Canada — unlike the U.S. — don't change with the seasons. David Detomasi, an assistant professor of international business at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont., calls the latest increases "pretty shocking." For the most part, he says, there's no reasonable explanation. While prices across the country vary widely due to various provincial and territorial tax regimes, prices in southern Ontario could hit record highs between 143 and 147 cents a litre by the end of this month, analyst Roger McKnight of Oshawa-based En-Pro International Inc. said Tuesday. "It's going to hit and stick," McKnight said. "Prices increased nine of the last 10 years in March and April, but this year they started in January and they are continuing to roll." Gas prices usually rise in the spring as refineries shut down to convert from producing diesel to gasoline as the summer driving and vacation months approach. This year, however, shutdowns of four refineries in Pennsylvania and five in Europe have severely cut North American supplies, McKnight said.Hmmmmm................."he says, there's no reasonable explanation." well try this one for an 'explanation'!How many of you are aware Sunoco, Conoco Phillips and The HESS Corp are all closing US oil refineries? Not many, as the media refuses to give this HUGE story coverage. My guess is that if Americans understood the complete truth to how we are being sold out, and enslaved there just might be the much needed revolution to turn this country around. Last September, both Sunoco and Conoco Phillips announced plant closing, effecting thousands of workers. Sunoco announced they are completely getting out of the oil industry. Closing up shop. They are done with the US oil industry. Sunoco is closing it's 2 oil refineries in July 2012 in Philadelphia and Marcus Hook, Pa. Those 2 facilities alone process over 500,000 barrels a day. Also announced last year, ConocoPhillips announced 2 plant closing for sure in Trainer, PA and Bayway, NJ., the other 3 plants are undecided as of today.
Conoco also announced they were closing their Alaskan refining facility: Just a week ago, the US 3rd largest oil refinery owned and operated by The HESS Corp just announced it's permanent closure. Costing over 2,000 jobs, and effecting 950 contractors.
Refineries on the East Coast of the US supply 40% of the gasoline sales and 60% of the diesel and other fuel oils. Of that, HALF that comes from the Sunoco and Conoco Phillips plant closures. When Conoco Phillips announced that it was closing the Trainer refinery, Willie Chiang, then ConocoPhillips' Senior Vice President of Refining, Marketing, Transportation and Commercial, noted that their decision to sell, like Sunoco's, was based on unfavorable economics caused by a competitive and difficult market environment characterized by "...product imports, weakness in motor fuel demand, and costly regulatory requirements." They are ALL closing up shop due to government regulations, union demands and excessive operating costs brought on by the Government regulations. Then you have the unions, led by Barry's buddy Leo Gerard saying they will close ALL US oil refineries starting from the east coast to west coast today.  Think gas and energy costs are high right now.......wait 6 months. You haven't seen anything yet. How can anyone expect any company to do business with an anti-American, hostile government out of control? You can't. That is why we are seeing a mass exodus, across the board in every industry in the US LEAVING.Hmmmm.......You will obey and buy electric cars.

Friday, March 9, 2012

Keystone oil pipeline bill fails in Obama controlled Senate.


Keystone oil pipeline bill fails in Obama controlled Senate.(Yahoo).Senate Democrats on Thursday defeated a Republican proposal to give a permit to the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline in a vote that will give Republicans more ammunition to criticize President Barack Obama's energy policies on the campaign trail.Republicans argue the pipeline, which would ship oil from Canada and northern states to Texas, would create jobs and improve energy security at a time of surging gasoline prices.
Obama put TransCanada's $7 billion project on hold earlier this year pending further environmental review. He took the unusual step of calling some senators personally ahead of the vote, asking them to reject the proposal.
"He understood that a majority of the American public, a majority at least in the Senate, are strongly in favor of this project," said Senator Richard Lugar, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations committee, who sponsored the bill to take control of the pipeline decision away from Obama.
The Republicans tried to advance their plan as an amendment to a highway funding bill. It failed on a vote of 56-42, four short of the 60 needed to pass, although 11 Democratic senators voted with the Republicans.Republicans are using the proposal to highlight Obama's delay of the project ahead of November presidential and congressional elections, linking his decision to rising gasoline prices.
"We're going to continue this fight," said Republican Senator John Hoeven of North Dakota, who championed the bill.
He told reporters he hoped the measure might still be attached to the highway funding package when the Senate and House of Representatives work on a final version.
"With gas prices going up every day, with what's going on in the Middle East, I'll tell you what: the pressure is just going to increase on the administration to get this project done," Hoeven said.Environmental groups have fought the project, staging large protests last year that pressured the Obama administration to block approval."Today's vote was a temporary victory and there's no guarantee that it holds for the long run," Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org, said in a statement.
"We're grateful to the administration for denying the permit and for Senate leadership for holding the line."
With a 34-64 vote, senators also defeated a proposal from Democratic Senator Ron Wyden that would have blocked exports of oil from the pipeline, as well as refined products made from that oil.
Wyden said lawmakers need to carefully think through projects that would increase exports of oil, fuel and natural gas, lest the exports end up boosting prices for Americans."This is just a step in what is clearly going to be an extensive debate," Wyden told Reuters after the vote.
Democratic senators who voted for the Republican Keystone plan included Max Baucus and Jon Tester of Montana, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, Claire McCaskill of Missouri and Jim Webb of Virginia.Two Republican senators were absent, and all the 45 who were present voted for the amendment.Hmmmm.......$ 6 A Gallon this Summer sounds right to me, 'reward' the voters.Read the full story here.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Canada sells the oil sands to China. Then complains about ‘foreign interference’


Canada sells the oil sands to China. Then complains about ‘foreign interference’.(NP).By Terry Glavin.If there were a global competition for the most brazen and preposterously transparent attempt by a ruling political party to change a necessary subject of national debate with alarmist distractions and hubbub, the Conservative escapade engineered in Ottawa these past few days really deserves some kind of grand prize.let’s review what’s really going on, shall we?
The $5.5-billion Enbridge pipeline project is all about sending Alberta bitumen in huge oil tankers to China. Beijing’s own state enterprises are among the project’s major backers, and Beijing has been buying up Alberta’s oilpatch at such a dizzying pace lately it’s hard to keep up.
  1. In the spring of 2010, China’s state-owned Sinopec Corp. took a $4.65-billion piece of Syncrude.
  2.  Then the China Investment Corporation, which is run by the Chinese Communist Party, took possession of a $1.25-billion share of Penn West Petroleum.
  3. Last summer, the Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation gobbled up Opti Canada for $2.34 billion. And so on.
  4. Then, last month, Sinopec spent $2.2-billion to take over Daylight Energy Ltd.,
  5.  and last week, Petro-China, with the final push of $1.9 billion, became the owner and manager of the MacKay River oilsands project. This is what Ottawa doesn’t want you noticing.
Until now, Beijing’s strategy has been to fly under the radar by taking only pieces of oil sands ventures and to murmur occasionally about bringing in Chinese workers or pulling up stakes altogether should they hear too much backchat. Now, everything’s changed. Sinopec’s Daylight deal was a first: it was a complete takeover of a Canadian oil sands company by a Chinese state corporation. The MacKay River deal was a first, too, but in a bigger way: when the McKay project is up and running in 2014 it will be a full Chinese show, with a boss that answers directly to Beijing. The thing is, nobody in Ottawa wants to have a serious conversation about any of this.During the 2008 election campaign, the vow to block the export of Canadian bitumen for processing offshore didn’t come from Leonardo DiCaprio in some underground command bunker of Hollywood eco-freaks. It was what the federal Conservative Party said. Back then, Ottawa’s very own Competition Policy Review made a series of recommendations about how to deal with takeovers of Canadian resources by foreign state-owned companies. Ottawa promptly ignored those recommendations. In last May’s federal election, the subject simply didn’t come up. And now it’s serious. Really serious.
It’s not just old-school Canadian nationalists who think so. Last April, a poll conducted for Canadian environmental groups found that 72.8 per cent of British Columbians were worried about China’s increasing command of Canada’s resources sector.
This isn’t just old Vancouver hippies worrying about the implications of 200-plus tankers taking oil out of Kitimat every year. Last summer, John Bruk, the Asia Pacific Foundation’s founding president, warned that Ottawa was ignoring the rapid emergence of Chinese government interests “in sheep’s clothing” taking over Canada’s natural resource industries. Bruk told B.C. Business magazine: “Are we jeopardizing prosperity for our children and grandchildren while putting at risk our economic independence? In my view, this is exactly what is happening.”As things have turned out, Bruk was more right than he knew.Read the full story here.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...