A Spanish Company Known As Scytl Will Be Reporting Election Results For Hundreds of U.S. Jurisdictions.Who or what is Scytl?(
AP).By Michael Snyder.Do you know who is going to be counting the votes on Election Day 2012? Most
Americans never even think about this. Most Americans just assume that their
votes will count and that the government will ensure that the counting process
is done honestly and fairly. But is this really the case?
Sadly, the
vast majority of people never take the time to "look behind the curtain" to see
how things really work. If they did, they might find themselves extremely upset
about what they would find.
The integrity of our voting process is of the
utmost importance. If we do not have the ballot box, then what avenues for
changing our government do we have left? Unfortunately, the integrity of our
elections has been called into question quite a few times in recent years, and
now a Spanish company known as Scytl will be involved in reporting election
results for hundreds of jurisdictions across the United States this upcoming
election day. Will those election results be accurate?
It is absolutely amazing that a foreign company has been able to
gain such control over the reporting of election results in the United States
without it ever making a significant splash in the mainstream media.
You
would think that there would be a law against this sort of thing, but apparently
there is not.
So how did this all come about?
Well, the story starts with a company called SOE
Software.
SOE Software was founded in 2002 and has been involved in
reporting election results
in
25 U.S. states....
Founded in 2002, SOE Software (SOE) has been working in 25 states
to provide election management tools that include online pollworker training and
election night reporting solutions to over 900 state and local election
jurisdictions.
SOE Software was purchased by a company based in
Barcelona, Spain known as Scytl
earlier
this year. This combination of the two companies has produced a giant firm.
Scytl now has
a
dominant market position in the election software market....
With the acquisition of SOE Software, Scytl is now the industry
leader in the election software market with a full range of solutions that cover
the whole election process and include secure online ballot delivery, Internet
voting, electronic pollbooks, election night reporting, and online pollworker
training.
Scytl will be involved in reporting election results
in more U.S. jurisdictions than any other company.
In fact, the new combined
company will be involved in reporting the election results
in
30 U.S. states....
The combined organization is the largest pure election software
company in the United States and will be serving customers in over 1,100
jurisdictions in 30 states, including 15 state-wide
customers.
So exactly how does all of this work?
Why
should we be concerned about what Scytl does with our votes?Bev Harris
of blackboxvoting.org has studied
voting systems in the United States extensively. According to her, the
combination of SOE Software and Scytl is going to make it much more difficult
for observers to independently verify the integrity of the voting results in
many jurisdictions. The following is an extended excerpt from a recent article
by Bev
Harris. It is a bit technical but it does a great job of breaking down how
things have changed now that Scytl has acquired SOE Software....
In a major step towards global centralization of election
processes, the world’s dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA’s
dominant election results reporting company.
When you view your local or state election results on the
Internet, on portals which often appear to be owned by the county elections
division, in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private
corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name
ClarityElections.com.
The good news is that this firm promptly reports precinct-level
detail in downloadable spreadsheet format. As reported by BlackBoxVoting.org in
2008, the bad news is that this centralizes one middleman access point for over
525 jurisdictions in AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY,
SC, TX, UT, WA. And growing.
As local election results funnel through SOE’s servers (typically
before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for
SOE essentially get “first look” at results and the ability to immediately and
privately examine vote details throughout the USA.
In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days
before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell
redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for
several national Republican Party operations.
This is worse: This
redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not
just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.
A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the
separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most
US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at
the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare
with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to
videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.
With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won’t work (if SCYTL’s
voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of
information, the public can perform its own “audit” by matching one number
against the other.
These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into
one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results
reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.
With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical
evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who
actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count.
So
should we trust that whatever election results Scytl gives us are accurate? Of
course not. The truth is that there have been all sorts of questions about the
integrity of Scytl voting systems.
The following example comes from a
recent article posted
on
westernjournalism.com....
The American advocacy group Project Vote has concluded that SCYTL’s
internet voting system is vulnerable to
attack from the outside AND the inside, a situation which could result in
'…an election that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters…' Talk
about having a flair for understatement!
There have also been
very serious questions about SOE Software. Bev Harris
of
blackboxvoting.org says that there have been major problems with SOE
Software election results in the past....
In Broward County FL, the results reported by Scytl-owned SOE
Software in 2008 showed an entire candidate, who was winning, disappear into
vapor in the middle of the count, and in Hillsborough County FL and Dallas
County TX, votes that had been reported began to disappear.
So
now we have a combination of SOE Software and Scytl. Considering the questions
that have surrounded both firms in the past, it is easy to see why so many
voting activists are deeply concerned.
There are a lot of rumors floating
around the Internet that George Soros is at least a part owner of Scytl, but so
far nobody has come forward with any solid evidence of this.
According to
Scytl, the primary investors in the company are Balderton Capital, Nauta Capital
and Spinnaker SCR. It is not known at this time whether George Soros has an
ownership stake in any of those venture capital firms.
In any event, it
is deeply troubling that a Spanish company will have control over the reporting
of election results from hundreds of jurisdictions in the United States on
election day.
Hopefully there will be no problems and the election
results will be 100% honest and accurate.
But what if they are
not?
Hmmmm.....“Withholding information is the essence of tyranny. Control of the flow of information is the tool of the dictatorship.”
~ Bruce Coville.
Read the full story
here.