Showing posts with label Pension funds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pension funds. Show all posts

Thursday, March 24, 2016

Canada - Ontario Teachers Pension Plan owns nearly Forty percent stake in Brussels Airport.


Canada - Ontario Teachers Pension Plan owns nearly Forty percent stake in Brussels Airport. (Observer).by Larry Fedoruk.

The Ontario Teachers Pension Plan owns 39% of the recently attacked Brussels Airport. They acquired the hefty stake in 2011.
On their website they offered a statement of sympathy and added that they are in close contact with the Belgian government, providing whatever support they can. It's unclear what that support might entail.
The Ontario Teachers Pension Plan (OTPP) has been around since 1990 and claims assets over $150 billion. They administer the pensions for approximately 182,000 teachers and school administrators and pay pensions to about 130,000 retirees.
It will be interesting to see how investors react in the future. Hmmm......Trudeau: 'Canada is not at war with ISIS'.Read the full story here.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) Releases Ontario Pre-Budget Submissions

SOURCE. 

Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) Releases Ontario Pre-Budget Submissions. HT: Taxpayers. By Christine Van Geyn.

The CTF’s submission calls for an expedited and detailed approach to a balanced budget, without increasing the tax burden on the public. The CTF recommends:
  • Reducing program spending and freezing public sector wages;
  • Ending all spending on corporate welfare;
  • An immediate moratorium on over-priced renewable power capacity;
  • Boosting revenue by breaking up the government monopoly of the Liquor Control Board of Ontario.
On the taxation side, the CTF’s submission also calls for:
  • Halting plans for the proposed 3.8 percent payroll tax, the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan; (See pic at top of the post).
  • Halting plans for a job killing and overly bureaucratic cap-and-trade carbon tax;
  • Reversing recent income tax hikes and ensuring all tax brackets are indexed to inflation.
The submission also makes a number of recommendations designed to improve accountability in the province, including a restoration of the Auditor General’s discretion in the review of partisan government advertising, amending the political appointment process, and amending the Police Services Act.

“Ontario was once an economic powerhouse, but with this government’s reckless spending and borrowing we have become a drain on the Canadian economy,” said Van Geyn. “By finally making the tough decisions that should have been made nearly a decade ago, the government can steer Ontario away from fiscal disaster.” Read the full story here.


Saturday, October 25, 2014

Great Britain closer to quitting EU.


Great Britain closer to quitting EU. (Express). By: Macer Hall

FURIOUS David Cameron last night conceded that Britain had been pushed closer to a European Union exit after receiving an eye-watering £1.7 billion Brussels bill.

Red-faced with anger, the Prime Minister vowed to block payment of the “completely unacceptable” surcharge presented by EU officials in a surprise overhaul of national contributions.

“It is not acceptable, it is an appalling way to behave,” Mr Cameron said.

Calls for the UK to withdraw from the EU intensified yesterday following the cash demand, which will cost every family in the country £65.

And he admitted the latest insult to UK taxpayers – with the bill due to be paid by December 1st – was undermining his drive to keep Britain in the EU.

When pressed on the issue by the Daily Express he said: “It certainly doesn’t help, put it that way.”


Mr Cameron insisted: “It is an unacceptable way for this organisation to work, to suddenly present a bill like this for such a vast sum of money with so little time to pay it.

“And it is an unacceptable way to treat one of the biggest contributors to the European Union.”

Repeatedly thumping his lectern with a clenched fist, he added: “I am not paying that bill on December 1st.
"If people think I am, they’ve got another thing coming; it is not going to happen.
“As an important contributor to this organisation, we are not suddenly going to get out our chequebook and write a cheque for two billion euros; it is not happening.”

As the row deepened, there was fresh pressure for the Prime Minister to accelerate his promised in-or-out referendum on Britain’s EU membership.

UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage warned that Mr Cameron was in “real political trouble”.
“Yes, it’s outrageous, but that’s how the European Union works,” he said.
“He’s in a very weak position. He can do nothing about this."
“And I think, really, he’s now being pushed into a position where, unless he brings forward his referendum promise, I think he’s in real political trouble.” More here.

RELATED:  'Euro Communism' 101 - New Law against Democratically Dismantling EU from Within.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

'Euro Communism' 101 - New Law against Democratically Dismantling EU from Within.


'Euro Communism' 101 - New Law against Democratically Dismantling EU from Within. HT: GatestoneInstitute.
It looks as if this new law is meant to serve as a severe roadblock to parties that would like to dismantle the EU in a democratic and peaceful way from within.
A rather dull semantic trick pro-EU figures usually apply, is calling their opponents "anti-Europe."
Two years ago the European Commission proposed a law that would authorize an “independent authority” within the European Parliament [EP] to decide whether EP parties would receive an official legal status as EP parties. 

This legal status is needed for a party to obtain EP party subsidy, which is designed to cover 85% of party expenditures.


Despite a British and Dutch lobby against the law, it was passed by the EP on September 29, 2014.

Among the demands parties have to meet are that of “internal party democracy” and that they must “respect the values on which the European Union is based.” Among these values are: “pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men.” Also, the parties must be active in at least seven out of 28 EU member state countries.

The law states that: “decisions regarding a party’s respect for values on which the EU is based, may only be taken following a special procedure and in cooperation with a committee of independent prominent individuals.”

Although the law does not specify the composition of this illustrious special committee, it is highly probable that Martin Schulz, the EP’s chairman, is among them. 

Schulz is a German socialist who got reelected as EP chairman even though he was absent during the parliamentary debate for the position. Schulz is also known for strongly condemning the content and distribution of a film critical of Islam, “Innocence of Muslims,” and for hisdisproportionate criticism of Israel.

Even though the committee is designated as an “independent authority,” within the self-aggrandizing dynamic of the EU, one cannot be “prominent” and “independent” at the same time.

Therefore, prominent individuals within the EU are those that fully and without any reticence subscribe to the EU’s mission of dismantling European nation states and furthering the EU’s influence at the cost of national democracies. More here.

Friday, February 14, 2014

Europe Considers Wholesale Savings Confiscation, Enforced Redistribution.


Europe Considers Wholesale Savings Confiscation, Enforced Redistribution.HT: ZeroHedge.
At first we thought Reuters had been punk'd in its article titled "EU executive sees personal savings used to plug long-term financing gap" which disclosed the latest leaked proposal by the European Commission, but after several hours without a retraction, we realized that the story is sadly true. 
Sadly, because everything that we warned about in "There May Be Only Painful Ways Out Of The Crisis" back in September of 2011, and everything that the depositors and citizens of Cyprus had to live through, seems on the verge of going continental.

In a nutshell, and in Reuters' own words, "the savings of the European Union's 500 million citizens could be used to fund long-term investments to boost the economy and help plug the gap left by banks since the financial crisis, an EU document says."
What is left unsaid is that the "usage" will be on a purely involuntary basis, at the discretion of the "union", and can thus best be described as confiscation.
The source of this stunner is a document seen be Reuters, which describes how the EU is looking for ways to "wean" the 28-country bloc from its heavy reliance on bank financing and find other means of funding small companies, infrastructure projects and other investment.

So as Europe finally admits that the ECB has failed to unclog its broken monetary pipelines for the past five years - something we highlight every month (most recently in No Waking From Draghi's Monetary Nightmare: Eurozone Credit Creation Tumbles To New All Time Low), the commissions report finally admits that "the economic and financial crisis has impaired the ability of the financial sector to channel funds to the real economy, in particular long-term investment."

The solution? "The Commission will ask the bloc's insurance watchdog in the second half of this year for advice on a possible draft law "to mobilize more personal pension savings for long-term financing", the document said."
Mobilize, once again, is a more palatable word than, say, confiscate.
And yet this is precisely what Europe is contemplating:
Banks have complained they are hindered from lending to the economy by post-crisis rules forcing them to hold much larger safety cushions of capital and liquidity.

The document said the "appropriateness" of the EU capital and liquidity rules for long-term financing will be reviewed over the next two years, a process likely to be scrutinized in the United States and elsewhere to head off any risk of EU banks gaining an unfair advantage.
But wait: there's more!

Inspired by the recently introduced "no risk, guaranteed return" collectivized savings instrument in the US better known as MyRA, Europe will also complete a study by the end of this year on the feasibility of introducing an EU savings account, open to individuals whose funds could be pooled and invested in small companies.
Because when corporations refuse to invest money in Capex, who will invest? Why you, dear Europeans. Whether you like it or not.
But wait, there is still more!
Additionally, Europe is seeking to restore the primary reason why Europe's banks are as insolvent as they are: securitizations, which the persuasive salesmen and sexy saleswomen of Goldman et al sold to idiot European bankers, who in turn invested the money or widows and orphans only to see all of it disappear.
It is also seeking to revive the securitization market, which pools loans like mortgages into bonds that banks can sell to raise funding for themselves or companies. The market was tarnished by the financial crisis when bonds linked to U.S. home loans began defaulting in 2007, sparking the broader global markets meltdown over the ensuing two years.

The document says the Commission will "take into account possible future increases in the liquidity of a number of securitization products" when it comes to finalizing a new rule on what assets banks can place in their new liquidity buffers. This signals a possible loosening of the definition of eligible assets from the bloc's banking watchdog.
Because there is nothing quite like securitizing feta cheese-backed securities and selling it to a whole new batch of widows and orphans.
And topping it all off is a proposal to address a global change in accounting principles that will make sure that an accurate representation of any bank's balance sheet becomes a distant memory:
More controversially, the Commission will consider whether the use of fair value or pricing assets at the going rate in a new globally agreed accounting rule "is appropriate, in particular regarding long-term investing business models".
To summarize: forced savings "mobilization", the introduction of a collective and involuntary CapEx funding "savings" account, the return and expansion of securitization, and finally, tying it all together, is a change to accounting rules that will make the entire inevitable catastrophe smells like roses until it all comes crashing down.
So, aside from all this, Europe is "fixed."

The only remaining question is: why leak this now? Perhaps it's simply because the reallocation of "cash on the savings account sidelines" in the aftermath of the Cyprus deposit confiscation, into risk assets was not foreceful enough? What better way to give it a much needed boost than to leak that everyone's cash savings are suddenly fair game in Europe's next great wealth redistribution strategy.

Update:

First It Was Bail-Ins And Now EU Sees “Personal Pension Savings” As “Plug” For Banks

An objective stress test of the euro zone's biggest banks could reveal a capital shortfall of a whopping  770 billion euros (more than $1 trillion), a study by an advisor to the EU's financial risk watchdog and a Berlin academic has found.

Related:

Some European banks 'have no future', need to 'die in an orderly fashion’– new bank supervisor



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...