Lots Of Mohammed's Visiting the Obama White House The Night Benghazi terrorist attack.

Lots Of Mohammed's Visiting the Obama White House The Night Benghazi terrorist attack.HT: InfidelBloggers. Source: UnslaveAmerica.

What was Obama doing in the immediate aftermath of the Benghazi murders?

Visiting with a bunch of people named Mohammed, naturally.

Lots of “Muhammads” visiting SpiteHouse night of Benghazi murders

8:30pm Victoria McCullough (formerly of DHS) Asst to director of the WH Office of Public Engagement (Jon Carson) met with 6 people in the WEST WING:

White House Log

Muhammad Ahsan

Muhammad J. Akram

Afnan Choudary

Afshan Fatima

Kokab Javed

Muhammad H. Javed

Hmmmm........"Don't shoot, we have been sent by MOHAMMMED MORSI" !

Judicial Watch: Benghazi Documents Point to White House on Misleading Talking Points.

Judicial Watch: Benghazi Documents Point to White House on Misleading Talking Points.HT: Judicialwatch.

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that on April 18, 2014, it obtained 41 new Benghazi-related State Department documents. 

They include a newly declassified email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.”  

Other documents show that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack” a possible kidnap attempt.

The documents were released Friday as result of a June 21, 2013, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the Department of State (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-00951)) to gain access to documents about the controversial talking points used by then-UN Ambassador Susan Rice for a series of appearances on television Sunday news programs on September 16, 2012.  Judicial Watch had been seeking these documents since October 18, 2012.

The Rhodes email was sent on sent on Friday, September 14, 2012, at 8:09 p.m. with the subject line:  “RE: PREP CALL with Susan, Saturday at 4:00 pm ET.”  The documents show that the “prep” was for Amb. Rice’s Sunday news show appearances to discuss the Benghazi attack.

The document lists as a “Goal”: “To underscore that these protests are rooted in and Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”

Rhodes returns to the “Internet video” scenario later in the email, the first point in a section labeled “Top-lines”:

[W]e’ve made our views on this video crystal clear. The United States government had nothing to do with it. We reject its message and its contents. We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence. And we are working to make sure that people around the globe hear that message.

Among the top administration PR personnel who received the Rhodes memo were White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, Deputy Press Secretary Joshua Earnest, then-White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer, then-White House Deputy Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri, then-National Security Council Director of Communications Erin Pelton, Special Assistant to the Press Secretary Howli Ledbetter, and then-White House Senior Advisor and political strategist Davie Plouffe.

The Rhodes communications strategy email also instructs recipients to portray Obama as “steady and statesmanlike” throughout the crisis. Another of the “Goals” of the PR offensive, Rhodes says, is “[T]o reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.” He later includes as a PR “Top-line” talking point:

I think that people have come to trust that President Obama provides leadership that is steady and statesmanlike. There are always going to be challenges that emerge around the world, and time and again, he has shown that we can meet them.

The Judicial Watch documents confirm that CIA talking points, that were prepared for Congress and may have been used by Rice on “Face the Nation” and four additional Sunday talk shows on September 16, had been heavily edited by then-CIA deputy director Mike Morell.

“Now we know the Obama White House’s chief concern about the Benghazi attack was making sure that President Obama looked good,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

“And these documents undermine the Obama administration’s narrative that it thought the Benghazi attack had something to do with protests or an Internet video.  Given the explosive material in these documents, it is no surprise that we had to go to federal court to pry them loose from the Obama State Department.”Read the full story here.

The post Judicial Watch: Benghazi Documents Point to White House on Misleading Talking Points appeared first on Judicial Watch.

Iranian Foreign Ministry disproves information regarding details of Zarif-Kerry meeting.

Iranian Foreign Ministry disproves information regarding details of Zarif-Kerry meeting.(Taz).

Iranian Foreign Ministry's Media Relations Office has published a statement disproving the information spread by some international media outlets regarding the meeting of Iranian Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif and the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Mehr news agency reported on Feb. 2.

Some international media outlets earlier reported that during the meeting within the Munich Security Conference, John Kerry told Mohammad Javad Zarif that the U.S. sanction imposed on Iran will remain, according to the report.

The statement from the Iranian Foreign Ministry's Media Relations Office has disproved this information and said Zarif and Kerry only discussed Iran's nuclear program and the future meeting between Iran and the P5+1 group, the report said.

"Any other information about the meeting does not correspond to the reality and we do not confirm them," the ministry said.

Zarif visited Germany to participate in the Munich Security Conference, IRIB News reported earlier.

During the meeting Zarif met with the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, according to the report.

The parties discussed the continuation of the nuclear talks between Iran and the P5+1 group.

Iran and the P5+1 reached a nuclear agreement on Nov. 24. Iran has agreed to curb some of its nuclear activities for six months in return for sanctions relief.

Iran and the P5+1 group have agreed to implement the agreement starting from Jan. 20.

Under the agreement, six major powers agreed to give Iran access to $4.2 billion in revenues blocked overseas if it carries out the deal, which offers sanctions relief in exchange for steps to curb the Iranian nuclear program.

Iran - Head of the Parliament's Nat Sec and Foreign Policy Commission: "Tehran not to halt uranium enrichment"

Iran - Head of the Parliament's Nat Sec and Foreign Policy Commission: "Tehran not to halt uranium enrichment" (Taz).

Head of the Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission Alaeddin Boroujerdi said on February 1 that Iran will definitely not halt uranium enrichment or shut Fordo site, Iran's Tasnim News Agency reported.

"Uranium enrichment and Ford site are the red lines for Iran in the negotiations. We can negotiate on enriching uranium up to 20 percent for now, but we should be able to enrich uranium whenever we need to do it," Boroujerdi said.

"Majlis has approved that the government cannot accept the halting of uranium enrichment completely," the Iranian MP said.

"Iran's right to enrich uranium is reserved by the NPT, so the base of the sanctions against the country is under question," Boroujerdi said.

"Iran seeks a couple of goals in the negotiations. First, the West should accept and announce Iran's right to enrich uranium. 

Second, the sanctions imposed on the country should be lifted, 

and third, the West should construct new power plants for Iran," Boroujerdi said adding that the western technology in constructing power plants is more sophisticated than that of Russia and China.

Iranian IRNA news agency reported on January 30 that Boroujerdi may be added to the country's nuclear negotiating team.

Parliament Spokesman Ali Larijani reportedly requested President Hassan Rouhani to allow Boroujerdi to be added to the negotiators.

IRNA did not provide a response from either Rouhani or Iran's FM Mohammad Javad Zarif on Larijani's preposition, while Mehr News agency reported that Rouhani has accepted Larijani's suggestion.

Elsewhere Larijani said that this is a common practice, which Iran had before, when an MP is involved in nuclear negotiations.

Larijani stressed that there's no need for MPs to be worried about the nuclear talks, and harshly spread it to the society, since the talks are carried out within a concrete framework.

Larijani's remarks came as a response to previous comments by one of the conservative party MPs, who criticized the Geneva nuclear agreement between Iran's nuclear negotiating team and P5+1 group.

Iran and the P5+1 reached a nuclear agreement on Nov. 24. Iran agreed to curb some of its nuclear activities for six months in return for the relief of sanctions. Iran and the P5+1 group agreed to implement the agreement starting from Jan. 20.

Under the agreement, six major powers agreed to give Iran the access to $4.2 billion in revenues blocked overseas if it carries out the deal, which offers sanctions relief in exchange for steps to curb the Iranian nuclear program.

The U.S. and its Western allies suspect Iran of developing a nuclear weapon - something that Iran denies. The Islamic Republic has on numerous occasions stated that it does not seek to develop nuclear weapons, using nuclear energy for medical researches instead.Hmmmm....Sounds like the next 'talks' will have a 'different sound'.

Is there a 'Secret Iran Deal' hidden from Congress? Iran Claims Side Deal in Geneva Agreement.

Is there a 'Secret Iran Deal' hidden from Congress? Iran Claims Side Deal in Geneva Agreement.
(NatR).

Iran’s top nuclear negotiator said in a Persian-language interview today that there are important details about the deal between Iran and the U.S. and major powers in a 30-page document that hasn’t been made public. 

This weekend, Iran and the P5+1 nations agreed to the final version of the deal (which commences next week) but haven’t released its actual text — and the Iranian official, Abbas Araqchi, said that they may never be released, amounting to what some are calling a “secret side deal.”

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Monday that the text of the implementing agreement would be released to lawmakers. He said the six parties were weighing how much of the text they could release publicly.

Hawkish American groups have called for the Obama administration to release the text of the agreement, but Araqchi’s claim about “nonpaper” text implies that Iran and the P5+1 powers have decided that certain elements of the deal to which they agreed should not be made public.

Araqchi says that text includes some of the restrictions on what kind of nuclear research Iran will be able to pursue: Western officials said on Sunday that existing projects could continue and research could go on, but that new physical projects can’t be begun.

Araqchi may have suggested otherwise, saying, “No facility will be closed; enrichment will continue, and qualitative and nuclear research will be expanded. All research into a new generation of centrifuges will continue.”

The Iranian comments about the “side deal” could have been misinterpreted (literally or figuratively), but his description of the Iranian understanding of the nuclear-research portion of the deal seems to suggest that there may be a gap between what the West has claimed about the deal and what Iran says it allows. We’ll have to see whether that confusion is cleared up.

White House Says Iran Implementation Agreement Being Kept Secret Because Of The EU

The text of an agreement reached Sunday to implement the interim nuclear deal with Iran is not available to the public because the European Union is not releasing it, the White House says.

“The EU is not making the document public,” National Security Council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan said on Sunday.

The fact that the document is not being released to the public has started to draw criticism from Iran hawks. “I urge the White House to publicly release the text of the implementation agreement with #Iran for all to review,” tweeted Sen. Mark Kirk, one of the authors of the sanctions legislation now moving through the Senate.Hmmm.....You mean to say Pres Obama would lie to the American people, you don't say!

Pres Obama's pen pall and Phone buddy Iran: Their 'Human Rights Records'

Pres Obama's pen pall and Phone buddy Iran: Their 'Human Rights Records'.HT Heritage.

One look at the human rights record of Iran should serve as a warning against President Hassan Rouhani’s charm offensive launched at the United Nations on Tuesday.

“My hope, aside from personal and national experience, emanates from the belief shared by all divine religions that a good and bright future awaits the world,” Rouhani said. Fine words, but Iran’s treatment of religious minorities and political prisoners denies far too many of Rouhani’s own fellow citizens any future at all. It is an international disgrace.

In preparation for Rouhani’s U.N. speech, Iran released a dozen political prisoners on September 19. “While the release of these individuals should be commended,” said Gissou Nia, executive director of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, “hundreds of other prisoners who have been incarcerated solely for the exercise of their human rights and the legitimate expression of their beliefs remain in Iran’s jails.”

According to the State Department’s Country Reports on Human Rights for 2012, Iranian prisons are absolute hell holes, filled way over capacity with an estimated 200,000 prisoners, many of them political and a number of them media professionals. Torture (including beatings, rape, pulling of nails, burning with cigarettes) is common. Over the decade up to 2012, according to the U.N. human rights rapporteur on Iran, 3,766 flogging sentences were handed down. Arrests are often arbitrary—for crimes such as anti-revolutionary behavior—and formal charges can take months.

The Iranian constitution provides for freedom of expression and of the press—except for those who would express words that are deemed “detrimental to the fundamental principles of Islam or the rights of the public.” As the state owns all media through the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, censors Internet activity, and controls social media, there are not a lot of options for dissenters and netizens.

Freedom of religion does not exist, with 99 percent of the population being Muslim and the remaining 1 percent being subject to harassment, intimidation and imprisonment, and, in cases of apostasy from Islam, death. The constitution declares that the “official religion is Islam and the doctrine followed is that of Ja’afari (Twelver) Shiism.” All laws and regulations must be based on “Islamic criteria” and Sharia.

If Rouhani wanted to show the world a new spirit, he could heed the calls to release the Christian pastor Youcef Nadarkhani. The pastor was handed an eight-year sentence under terrible conditions in Evin prison, which is notorious for cruel and prolonged torture, for practicing his faith and trying to establish an orphanage. Nadarkhani’s wife bravely accosted Iranian delegates at the U.N., handing them a letter for Rouhani. (She has not received much support from the U.S. government in the fight for her husband’s release, by the way.)


As the Obama Administration launches itself on a new round of nuclear negotiations with Iran, let’s remember that the first victims of the Tehran regime are the Iranian people.

 Obama said the following:

“I have no patience for countries that try to treat gays or lesbians or transgender persons in ways that intimidate them or are harmful to them…One of the things I think is very important for me to speak out on is making sure that people are treated fairly and justly because that’s what we stand for, and I believe that that’s a precept that’s not unique to America. That’s just something that should apply everywhere.”

Iranian human rights official describes homosexuality as an illness

Hmmm.....'A man is known by the company he keeps'