"The Gutsy Photoshop" - The illusion of Obama's bin Laden raid situation room leadership.(
TOF).
Mara Zebest says
apparently, my previous article on the
famous "Situation Room" photo tapped a nationwide nerve. The response ranged
from some eye-opening tips on other photos to a few perplexed criticisms as to
the motivation for Photoshopping a Situation Room photo.
The answer to
that latter question can be summed up in one simple thought: To hide the truth.
Obama was
out golfing while the OBL mission was unfolding, and the administration
needed the Situation Room photo op for public perception -- to give the illusion
that he's presidential. Obama's entire "Composite Presidency" and administration are
orchestrated in this fashion. Not only is the photo's legitimacy in question,
but so is the narrative illusion behind it. Obama
knew
of OBL's location for a year and refused to act.
The CIA admits that there
was "no live video feed," as implied by the iconic White House photo. It is
anyone's guess what the captive audience was looking at, but it wasn't the OBL
raid. It was recently reported that a
highly
lawyered CYA memo was drafted that made it clear that the military would
take all blame for any errors, while Obama would claim all glory for successes.
Not surprisingly, the real heroes seem to have a problem with this form of
spiking
the ball and using our brave SEALs for political gain.
Why would Obama need
to Photoshop the Situation Room photos? For the same reason behind everything
else he does: to influence perception in which everything
is about Obama.
As a follow-up to
the
previous article, a second "Situation Room" photo will be the target of
discussion
here.
For those who would like to download the image, a high-resolution version can be
found here.
This
White House Flickr link is a great place to check for high-resolution sizes
of many of the White House photo sets released.
At first glance, the
image overwhelms the viewer with a massive backside of Obama's jacket --
oddly oversized shoulders and arms supporting
another
small-head redux. Any more photos like this, and one might start speculating
that
Jeebs is
the inspiration.
In all fairness, the initial impression leads the eye to believe
that the beige fabric under the right armpit belongs to Robert Gates' pants
(standing near Obama on the right). However, if that were the case, then who
would be attached to the pant leg under the left armpit? It's not intuitively
obvious, and it takes the viewer a little time to eventually come to a
conclusion that these fabric strips are side panels built into the jacket
design. Maybe the New York Times found the presence of this fabric an odd
distraction as well -- and the reason behind their
cropped
version.
Even with this oddity solved, the image is not without
significant problems.
Moving up the Iron Man-like shoulders to the blurry
Jeebs-sized head, zoom in for an extreme close-up of the right neck edge and
ear. The right edge of the neck is missing a small but important piece -- it
suffers a disappearing act as it approaches the jacket edge and displays a
transparent gap (where a phone sitting on the desk can be seen through the
neck).
The right ear is also inconsistent along the defining edge. The
top ear rim edge is blurry but still clearly visible (similar to the left ear
edge), but as the eye travels down around the right ear edge, an abrupt chunk is
taken away from the outer ear rim, and the remaining pixel edge transition is
significantly sharper (less blurry) for the lower portion.
Shifting to a different image section, it appears that there is
a floating hand among the Situation Room attendees. Just to verify that a body
wasn't being eclipsed by the folks in front, it seemed reasonable to obtain some
answers by examining the reflections in the monitors on the wall behind them.
By applying an image adjustment to lighten all the color values in the monitors,
the reflection detail becomes more pronounced and easier to discern. Keep in
mind that the adjustment applied to the monitors will distort color values --
thus the shirt that appears white could be the blue-shirted man seen in the
photo.
That said, the man in the reflection has his hand in front -- near his
chin -- not at his back. The curvature of the fingers appears different from
that of the floating hand's, as well as the fact that it is a man in the
reflection, while the floating hand displays feminine
characteristics.
The blue-shirted man standing in the room does not appear to be
a match for the man in the reflection. So if the reflection is not the
blue-shirted man, but rather an eclipsed individual, then where is the
blue-shirted man found in the reflection? Wouldn't he be seen in front of the
eclipsed individual (within the reflection)? Conversely, if the floating hand
does not match the reflected man's hand, then where in the room is the reflected
man (whose hand is near the chin)? Not to mention that the body for the
floating hand has still not been accounted for via the reflection (more on
floating hands in next item).
In case you were wondering how the people in the room translate
to the rear monitor reflections, a capture is provided for your evaluation.
Keep in mind that the reflections are at angles similar to looking in a mirror
and viewing information at the opposing angle.
Hmmmm......Another 'production' by "The Make Believe Presidency".Read and see the full story
here.