Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Syria: Cutaneous leishmaniasis sweeping Middle East


Syria: Cutaneous leishmaniasis sweeping Middle East. (Independent).

Via The IndependentCutaneous leishmaniasis: What is the tropical disease eating its way through Syria and can it be stopped? Excerpt:
A tropical parasitic disease causing serious disfiguration is sweeping across the Middle East. Cutaneous leishmaniasis has been common in Syria for centuries but recent social unrest and breakdown in the healthcare system have seen it develop into a major epidemic. 
The disease is identifiable through vast sores on the skin, which can be both painful and permanently disfiguring. 
Research has revealed hundreds of thousands of people are now suffering from the condition in refugee camps or trapped in conflict zones. It is thought close proximity caused by cramped conditions is facilitating the disease’s spread, compounded by lack of healthcare structures due to civil unrest and societal breakdown amid the on-going conflict and mass displacement. 
What is it? 
Also known as 'aleppo evil', cutaneous leishmaniasis is a tropical disease caused by a parasite in the blood stream. It is transmitted from person to person through sand fly bites, which are common in the Middle East. 
Other forms exist with varying severity. Visceral leishmaniasis is the most severe form and results in fever, as well as enlargement of the liver and spleen. It can be fatal if left untreated. Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis eats away at the membranes of the nose, mouth and throat. 
Where is it? 
Scientists have warned it is multiplying rapidly in Syria with hundreds of thousands of cases suspected. In Lebanon, there were six reported cases between 2000 and 2012, by comparison 1,033 cases were reported in 2013 alone. 
Cases have also been reported in Turkey, Jordan, Eastern Libya and Yemen.  
What does it do? 
It causes large open sores on the skin. The sores are painful and often lead to permanent disfiguration. The sores are also vulnerable to secondary infection, spreading further disease.
Why is it spreading now? 
Previously the disease has been largely contained to Syria. However, amid societal breakdown due to conflict there, it has increased. Lack of healthcare resources means the condition has not been treated and as people have become trapped in conflict zones they have increased in close contact with other people, further spreading the disease. Poverty and malnutrition, as well as lack of access to clean water, may be further exasperating the situation. 
It appears to have spread outside of Syria partly due to refugees fleeing the area. Refugee camps often involve living in close quarters with strangers, without medical treatment facilities beyond those which can provide emergency or basic care. Read the full story here.

Saturday, May 21, 2016

'Only 50% of refugee children attend primary school, and 25% secondary school' : UNESCO and UNHCR.


'Only 50% of refugee children attend primary school, and 25% secondary school' : UNESCO and UNHCR. (Fides).

In a report made public in recent days, on the occasion of the World Humanitarian Summit to be held in Istanbul on 23 and 24 May, UNESCO and UNHCR reported that only 50% of refugee children attend primary school, and 25% secondary school.

In 2015, 38% of primary school pupils were girls in Kenya. 80% in Egypt, Iran or Yemen go to school, but 50% in Ethiopia and 40% in Pakistan.

The situation is particularly serious for girls.

In Kakuma camp in Kenya, and in the Iraqi province of Nayaf, 81% of displaced adolescents in the age group between 15 and 17 have never attended school.

This situation is even worse in Afghanistan, where a mere 1% of girls go to school, compared to 20% of males.

Related: Syria's Children: the "Dragon's teeth"

Sunday, May 8, 2016

Video - 'Dragon Teeth' - Saudi Mufti recruiting men above 15 yrs old at a Syrian refugee camp.

The generation growing up in those camps will have no interest in our world, except insofar as it has excluded them. And when we have finished digging our own graves, they will be the ones to bulldoze us into them.

Related:  Flashback 2014 :  Syria's Children: the "Dragon's teeth"


Thursday, December 31, 2015

Russia welcomes adoption of counter terrorist legislation by China.


Russia welcomes adoption of counter terrorist legislation by China.(RBTH).

Russia is confident that the adoption of legislation on fighting terrorism in China will help further consolidate counterterrorism cooperation between the two countries.

"We are confident that the adoption of the said legislative act will help further consolidate dynamically developing Russian-Chinese counter terrorism cooperation within the framework of privileged strategic partnership between our two countries," the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a commentary available on its website on Dec. 30.


The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of China passed legislation on fighting terrorism on Dec. 27.

Moscow and Beijing "stand up concordantly in favor of preserving the UN's central coordinating role in global anti terrorist efforts, which should be free from politicization and preconditions, setting up a broad antiterrorist coalition to combat ISIS [a terrorist organization banned in Russia], and taking comprehensive measures to oppose the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters, including in the context of lowering risks for the Central Asian region," it said.


"Not only do Russia and China impartially assess the complicated antiterrorist situation in the world, but they also display preparedness to take joint measures to correct it," the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

Sunday, December 27, 2015

New law allows China's People's Liberation Army to undertake counter terror missions overseas.


New law allows China's People's Liberation Army to undertake counter terror missions overseas. (NewsIcrosschina).

A new Counterterrorism Law makes it legal for China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) to get involved in antiterror operations abroad.

According to the law approved by China's top legislature on Sunday afternoon, the PLA and China's armed police forces could carry out counterterror missions overseas with the approval of the Central Military Commission.

Public security and national security authorities could also send personnel overseas for counter-terrorist missions, but these must be approved by the State Council and agreements signed with the countries concerned.

China has studied U.S. and European Union laws in drafting its own counterterrorism bill which requires tech firms to assist security authorities to prevent and investigate terrorism, an legislative official said here Sunday.

At a press conference held at the end of a week-long session of China's top legislature, Li Shouwei of the National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee legislative affairs commission, admitted that a number of countries and enterprises had voiced concerns about certain provisions in the law.

He pointed to Article 18 of the new law, which requires telecom operators and internet service providers to provide technical support and assistance, including decryption, to police and national security authorities in prevention and investigation of terrorist activities.

Li said the rule accorded with the actual work need of fighting terrorism and was basically the same as what other major countries in the world do.

"The clause reflects lessons China has learnt from other countries and is a result of wide solicitation of public opinion," he added.

"(It) will not affect companies' normal business nor install backdoors to infringe intellectual property rights, or ... citizens freedom of speech on the internet and their religious freedom," Li said.    

The law, which goes into effect January 1, was criticized by Western countries while it was being drafted, particularly over its cyber provisions. U.S. President Barack Obama and the U.S. State Department objected publicly to the law's requirement that overseas technology firms submit product encryption keys to the Chinese government as a condition for doing business in China.

 A key is a way of encoding messages so that two parties using communications software can exchange messages privately without fear of eavesdropping.

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Erdogan threatening Russia: 'Turkey will not allow "terror to take root" or "fait accompli situations" next to its borders'.


Erdogan threatening Russia: 'Turkey will not allow "terror to take root" or "fait accompli situations" next to its borders'. (Jpost).

Turkey will not allow "terror to take root" or "fait accompli situations" next to its borders, President Tayyip Erdogan said on Thursday, in an apparent reference to Russian air strikes in neighbouring Syria.

Erdogan made the comment in a parliamentary speech in Ankara.

The Russian air force began air strikes in Syria on Wednesday, targeting areas near the cities of Homs and Hama in the west of the country, where President Bashar al-Assad's forces are fighting a number of insurgent groups, though not Islamic State, which is based mostly in the north and east. Hmmm.....Hmmm.... 'I'll huff, and I'll puff, and I'll blow your house in' said the Caliph of the Muslim Brotherhood. Read the full story here.

Putin ushers in a new era of geopolitics in the Middle East.


Putin ushers in a new era of geopolitics in the Middle East. HT: UnderstandingWar.

One thing is clear: if the Kremlin had set out to design a 2015 exercise season to hone the most important skills its troops would need to conduct air support of Syrian troops with a very limited high-impact ground footprint, they could hardly have done better.

It is reasonable to expect, therefore, that the coming days will see Russian Su-25 Frogfoots, Hind helicopters, Su-24 Fencers, and Su-30 Flankers beginning to conduct air operations against rebel targets on behalf of the Syrian regime.

It would not be surprising if small groups of Spetsnaz or airborne troops began conducting targeted raids against high-value rebel targets as well. The Russians appear to have prepared their forces for these kinds of missions.

Putin is not simply intervening to attack ISIS. His stated goal and posture is to support the Assad regime and Bashar al Assad in particular. The deployment of Russian forces into Syria therefore effectively guarantees that Assad can remain in power for as long as Putin chooses to back him, thus obviating the need for Assad to make any meaningful concessions to the opposition.

Assad’s forces had been reeling from the advances of multiple rebel groups and running out of reinforcements. His regime might have faced collapse, he might have been pushed aside, or he might have felt compelled to negotiate seriously with his Syrian opponents. Now he is likely to become extremely intransigent.

The only path to ending the war thus offered by this Russian adventure is the crushing of the majority Sunni Arab population in Syria by the combined forces of Assad, Iran, Lebanese Hezbollah, and the Kremlin. It is hard to see that approach being successful.

Any serious plan for bringing peace, ultimately, to Syria requires separating supporters of ISIS and al Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al Nusra from the bulk of the Syrian Sunni Arab population now working with them for lack of any better alternatives. That approach requires differentiating among the various groups fighting against Assad, identifying which ones might be lured away, and determining what would be required to lure them.

Putin, it seems clear, has no interest whatsoever in such an approach. He told U.S. networks that “provision of military support to illegal structures runs counter to the principles of modern international law and the United Nations Charter,” and made it clear that he regards the only “legitimate government entities” in Syria to be the organs of Assad’s government.

It is likely, therefore, that Russian support for Assad will take the form of an indiscriminate attack against Assad’s opponents, regardless of the degree of their affiliation with ISIS or JN. Such an effort will tend to unify the Syrian opposition with the jihadists against the Russians and Assad.

If the U.S. appears to support Russia—a position the Obama Administration seems to be steadily drifting toward—it will solidify the idea that all of the Western powers are united with Iran behind Assad and that only al Qaeda and ISIS offer international support for the struggle against the ‘Alawite government.

A blank-check support for the Assad regime of the sort Putin is ready to provide, in other words, is very likely to backfire, further radicalizing the conflict and permitting the continued commitment of war crimes by the Assad regime.

The path of least resistance for the U.S. will be gradually coming to terms with the new reality and making a virtue of necessity by cooperating, reluctantly at first and then more enthusiastically, with the RussianIranian-Syrian axis that is now forming.

It will, in other words, continue the trend of realigning the American geostrategic position the Middle East fundamentally. More remarkably, it may represent the opening of a new Russian flank against NATO and against America’s ability to operate in the region. Read the full story here.

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Obama's BFF Iran says to meet no limitations regarding missiles.


Obama's BFF Iran says to meet no limitations regarding missiles. (Taz).

Iran Army Commander Ataollah Salehi has said the country will meet no limitation regarding its missile system.

The official further said that Iran would not allow any foreign authority to access its missile facilities either, Fars news agency reported Sept. 22.

Asked of his opinion about restrictions on Iran’s missile program under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Salehi said the technical terms of the JCPOA are different from media reports claiming such restrictions.

There are reports that the JCPOA contains parts that restrict Iran’s military program, missile capabilities in particular. Some parties in Iran worry that the terms of the deal are arranged so as to weaken the country militarily.


On the possibility of Iran-US cooperation in fighting the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), he said since the US is actually the one that operates the terrorist group, Iran cannot have any cooperation with the US in that regard.

Monday, September 21, 2015

Video - Iranian General Salami: Our Missiles, Drones Can Target U.S. Aircraft Carriers Anywhere in Region



Video - Iranian General Baloni Salami: Our Missiles, Drones Can Target U.S. Aircraft Carriers Anywhere in Region.

In a recent TV interview, IRGC Deputy Commander Brigadier-General Hossein Salami said that Iran was capable We are capable "of targeting [U.S.] airbases anywhere in the region" by means of its stealth missiles. "Their aircraft carriers are completely within the range of our ballistic missiles," he said. Salami further said that Iran has long-range combat drones capable of attacking "air bases and aircraft carriers alike." The interview aired on IRINN TV on September 15, 2015.

Friday, April 10, 2015

'Moderate & Peaceful' Iran plans to build 50MW and 100MW nuclear power plants


Iran plans to build 50MW and 100MW nuclear power plants. (Taz).

Iran plans to build nuclear power plants with 50 megawatts and 100 megawatts capacity.

Considering the country’s climatic and geographical conditions, we have focused on building small-scale 50MW and 100MW power plants,” the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Ali Akbar Salehi said Iran’s Mehr news agency reported on April 10.

Nuclear power plants can be built to generate up to 1,000MW of electricity, he said, adding that building small-scale power plants is more economically justified.

We are negotiating with a number of countries. If finalized, building two small-scale power plants on the Persian Gulf coasts will be started,” he added.

Salehi also unveiled plans for the construction of facilities for sea water desalination along with the new nuclear power plants as part of efforts to help agricultural development.
Iran has said it aims to produce 20,000 megawatts of electricity from nuclear power.

The country's only nuclear power plant in Bushehr, which produces 1,000 megawatts, became officially operational and was connected to Iran’s national grid in September 2011. Hmmm....Just great, in a country known for it's frequent earthquakes, lets build all small nuclear plants.....what could go wrong?


Related: Iran eyeing development of many small reactors instead of one big reactor.

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Iran to Inject Gas into IR8 centrifuges on 1st Day of Implementing Nuclear Deal.


Iran to Inject Gas into IR8 centrifuges on 1st Day of Implementing Nuclear Deal. (Fars).

Iran's foreign minister and nuclear chief both told a closed-door session of the parliament on Tuesday that the country would inject UF6 gas into the latest generation of its centrifuge machines as soon as a final nuclear deal goes into effect by Tehran and the six world powers.

Zarif and the Atomic Energy Organiation of Iran (AEOI) Chief Ali Akbar Salehi are taking part at a closed-door session at the parliament this morning to brief the legislature about the details of the latest round of the nuclear talks with the Group 5+1 (the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany) and the joint statement released by the seven nations in Lausanne, Switzerland, on Thursday.

"The AEOI chief and the foreign minister presented hopeful remarks about nuclear technology R&D which, they said, have been agreed upon during the talks (with the six world powers), and informed that gas will be injected into IR8 (centrifuge machines) with the start of the (implementation of the) agreement," member of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission Javad Karimi Qoddousi said following the closed-door session at the legislature today.

The lawmaker further pointed out that the Iranian Foreign Ministry also plans to release a Factsheet about the Lausanne statement to stress the concerns of the nation and the MPs, reiterating that the release of this factsheet has been the most important news given to the MPs in today's session.

"This is the most important thing that we should wait for in the next few days so that those issues that have stirred serious concern among the Iranians will be revised and released in this factsheet," he added. Hmmm.......This deal stinks from all sides.

French fact sheet differs from US on Iran’s centrifuge use, sanctions relief, inspectors’ access.


French fact sheet differs from US on Iran’s centrifuge use, sanctions relief, inspectors’ access. (TOI).

A French government fact sheet on the Iran framework deal, which has not been made public by Paris but which has been seen by The Times of Israel, provides for Iran to gradually introduce the use of advanced centrifuges to enrich uranium after 12 years, in contrast to the US official parameters, which make no such specific provision

The use of the more advanced IR-2 and IR-4 centrifuges, as permitted according to the French fact sheet, would enable Iran to more rapidly accumulate the highly enriched uranium needed to build nuclear weapons, accelerating its breakout time to the bomb.

The French fact sheet also specifies that Iran will be allowed to continue RandD work on the advanced IR-4, IR-5, IR-6 and IR-8 centrifuges, the last of which can enrich uranium at 20-times the speed of Iran’s current IR-1 centrifuges, whereas the American parameters are less specific.

Differences between the texts issued by Paris and Washington also extend to the question of inspection and supervision of Iran’s activities, with the French document indicating that the IAEA, the International Atomic Energy Agency, will be able to visit any suspect site in Iran — so-called “anywhere, anytime” access — whereas the US document is less far-reaching.

The two documents also differ in their terminology as regards the scale and timing of sanctions relief as the deal takes effect. Hmmm....We already know the Obama 'Admin' has a track record of lying, question is WHY? Read the Full story here.



What else is the Iranian regime hiding in its nuclear program?


What else is the Iranian regime hiding in its nuclear program? (Newsweek).

On March 23, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Yukiya Amano, once again emphasized that his organization’s probe of the possible military dimensions of the Iranian nuclear program had made only very limited progress, owing to a general lack of Iranian cooperation. 

Earlier in the month, Amano called upon Iran to accept snap inspections of suspicious sites in order to help resolve outstanding questions about Iran’s intentions and its proximity to nuclear weapon capability.

In an article published in Newsweek on Tuesday, Lord Alex Carlile of Berriew, a Liberal Democrat member of the U.K. House of Lords and Giulio Maria Terzi, former Italian foreign minister warn that any signing of a nuclear agreement with Tehran should be hinged upon the outcome of inspection of the Lavizan-3 site, the Parchin site and other pending and unanswered issues regarding the nature of the Iranian nuclear program.

The writers hoped that "France, the U.S. Congress and other relevant players will provide sufficient support to the IAEA and will encourage it to demand immediate inspection of the Lavizan-3 site and make its findings public quickly.”

Unless Tehran is compelled to comply with these demands, any belief regarding the peaceful and civilian nature of the Iranian nuclear program will be delusional, and there will be no credible assurance that Tehran’s pathways to obtaining nuclear weapons have been blocked,” they said. Hmmmm......As i said before: "If there was a nuclear Fatwa there would be no need for Hidden Facilities." Read the article here.

After lifting sanctions against Iran, Russia may deliver S-300 and or other weapon systems.


After lifting sanctions against Iran, Russia may deliver S-300 and or other weapon systems.(Taz).

Lifting weapons sanctions against Iran will allow Russia to continue military-technical cooperation with the country by supplying new equipment, including air defense weapons and upgrading weapons and equipment already in use, Head of International Cooperation Department of Rostec Corporation Victor Kladov told RIA Novosti news agency Apr.7.

The potential need of Iran in the purchase of Russian arms, in case of lifting weapons sanctions from Tehran, is currently estimated at $11-13 billion, according to the Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade.


Iran is our traditional partner in military-technical cooperation,” said Kladov. “Of course, in case of lifting weapons sanctions, we will continue this cooperation with deliveries of new weapons, as well as repair and modernization of the existing Soviet and Russian-made equipment.

Commenting on the possibility of delivery of S-300 to Iran, Kladov said that Russia has a rich range of air defense systems.” We can both return to the initial contract, and offer other air defense complexes and systems,” the representative of Rostec Corporation said.

 Iran filed a lawsuit against Russia’s intermediary agency for exports and imports of defense-related and dual use products, technologies and services, the Rosoboronexport in the arbitration court of Geneva, Switzerland.

Russia offered to make peace, promising the new supplies of the Tor-M1E surface-to-air missile systems. Hmmm......Just some 'Fallout' from the deal of the century.

Obama Admits: Nuclear Deal only 'Delay of execution'


Obama Admits: Nuclear Deal only 'Delay of execution'. (ToI).

Defending an emerging nuclear deal, President Barack Obama said Iran would be kept a year away from obtaining a nuclear weapon for more than a decade, but conceded Tuesday that the buffer period could shrink to almost nothing after 13 or more years

What is a more relevant fear would be that in Year 13, 14, 15, they have advanced centrifuges that enrich uranium fairly rapidly, and at that point, the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero,” Obama said.

Although Obama acknowledged that Iran’s breakout time could shrink, he said at least the world would have better insight into Iran’s capabilities because of extensive inspections in the earlier years. Read the Full 'fairy tale' story here.

Related: After the final deal, gas injection to IR8 centrifuges will start,....(TWO Months to breakout)

Iran to issue nuclear accord fact sheet.......'Iranian Style'....Latest generation centrifuges included.


Iran to issue nuclear accord fact sheet.......'Iranian Style'. (Taz).

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and Atomic Energy Organization of Iran chief Aliakbar Salehi said that in the few days the Foreign Ministry will publish a fact sheet detailing Iran’s recent nuclear framework agreement with world powers, said MP Javad Karimi Ghoddusi.

The lawmaker made the statement reporting a closed session between Iranian MPs and nuclear negotiators, Fars news agency reported April 7.

He pointed out that the fact sheet is the most persistent obsession with the MPs in relation to the Lausanne nuclear talks, because it is expected to answer their concerns about the agreement.

Karimi Ghoddusi stated that during the session, the nuclear team had provided persuasive answers to the MPs questions on the nuclear agreement.

They also said that after the final deal, gas injection to IR8 centrifuges will start, he pointed out.

The latest talks by Iran and the group P5+1 (the US, UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany) ended in a framework agreement on April 2.

Zarif and European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini, who also attended the talks, read a final statement at the end of the 8-day talks which clarified the objectives of a final deal which is to be reached by July 1.

The deal would limit Tehran’s nuclear activities beyond the NPT requirements to ensure the great powers of the peacefulness of the country’s nuclear program, and in return it would lift all international sanctions on the Islamic Republic’s economy. Hmmm.......IR8 the latest generation of centrifuges.......Would only give a TWO month breakout time!


'Death to the nuclear Fatwa' - "Iran could make atomic bombs any time it chooses" Zarif.


'Peaceful and transparent' Iran not to allow cameras in nuclear sites. (Taz).

An Iranian parliament member quoted Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif as saying that Iran will not allow installation of online cameras in its nuclear centers.

Iranian MP Gholamali Jafarzadeh Imenabadi said Zarif made the remarks during a closed-door session of the parliament this morning which was attended by the foreign minister and the Head of Atomic Energy Organization of Iran Ali Akbar Salehi.

Zarif told the parliament that Tehran is not going to permit online cameras for inspection purposes, said the lawmaker.

Imenabadi made the remarks while talking to IRNA on April 7 after the end of the in-camera session in which Zarif briefed the parliament members on the process of nuclear talks which led to Swiss Statement last week.

He said that during the session, Salehi compared Iran’s nuclear capabilities to countries like Japan, Brazil and Argentine and said Iran owes its nuclear power totally to local scientists.

Salehi also said western countries consented to enter negotiations with Iran because they had no other choice, the parliamentarian said.

Zarif said Iran is not going to allow online cameras in its nuclear facilities because of its past bitter experiences of assassination of its nuclear scientist, the MP added.

Zarif also said people had no reason to worry about disclosure of classified documents because Iran is not allowing anything beyond internationally approved inspection mechanisms.

I told the western countries that Iran is not building atomic bombs not because of pressures and sanctions but because of the religious decree issued by the Supreme Leader Ayatolah Ali Khamenei. So Iran is not going to do this under any situation,” Zarif was quoted saying.


Zarif has also told the westerners that Iran could make atomic bombs any time it chooses,” Imenabadi added.

Monday, April 6, 2015

Iranian Regime Continues Its Lies on Khamenei's Nonexistent Fatwa Banning Nuclear Weapons.


Iranian Regime Continues Its Lies on Khamenei's Nonexistent Fatwa Banning Nuclear Weapons.(Memri).

In President Obama's announcement of the joint statement following the conclusion of the negotiations in Lausanne, he again mentioned the nonexistent fatwa, stating as fact that Iran’s Supreme Leader has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons.[1]
This assertion by the president is not true. Such a fatwa has never been issued, and to this day no one has been able to show it, as MEMRI has detailed in five reports so far.[2]
The following is the sixth MEMRI report, constituting an update about this nonexistent fatwa.

Introduction.

The Iranian regime has persisted in its attempts to deceive the West in the matter of a fatwa that it claims was issued by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei banning nuclear weapons. The deception focuses on both the fatwa's alleged date of issue and on its alleged content. This fatwa has never been presented by Iran and in fact does not exist.

An Iranian international law expert published, on the BBC Persian website, an article stating that no such fatwa was ever issued.

One (Nonexistent) Fatwa – Many Dates.

Following the continuing pressure on the Iranian regime to come up with Khamenei's (nonexistent) fatwa that allegedly bans nuclear weapons, the regime recently published, on one of the two websites where Khamenei's fatwas are published, a letter sent by Khamenei in April 2010 to the Tehran International Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation.

The letter, in Farsi, Arabic, English, and Spanish, was posted under the heading "New Fatwas." (see Appendix I). On February 26, 2015, Khamenei tweeted, "We consider the use of WMDs as Haraam [forbidden]" and linked to the letter on the website.[3]

The presentation of this letter as a (new) fatwa proves that no such fatwa was ever issued before; likewise, the letter to the conference does not constitute a religiously binding fatwa, but is a political statement with no religious significance.

Additionally, the nonexistent fatwa has over the years been given different dates of issue by different Iranian regime spokesmen, but none have ever actually presented it.[4]

In May 2012, before being elected president, Hassan Rohani claimed that the fatwa was issued in 2004, when was heading the Iranian delegation to the nuclear talks with the EU3.

He also stated that it was he, Rohani, who had thought to present Khamenei's statements in a November 5, 2004 Friday sermon at Tehran University to the EU3 prior to the signing of the November 2004 Paris Agreement, as a fatwa to guarantee that Iran was not striving to develop nuclear weapons.[5]

As noted, the Khamenei sermon that Rohani presented as a fatwa was delivered in 2004, whereas Khamenei's letter to the conference, identified as a "new" fatwa on his website, is dated 2010.

One (Nonexistent) Fatwa – Different Content

Furthermore, Khamenei, in his November 5, 2004 sermon, defined possessing, storing, and using nuclear weapons as "problematic" – not as "prohibited (haram)."[6] However, in his 2010 letter, Khamenei defines nuclear weapons as prohibited (haram; see Appendix I).[7]

Appendix I: Khamenei's Letter To The 2010 Tehran Conference

The following screenshot shows Khamenei's April 2010 letter to the Tehran International Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, under the "New Fatwas" section of his fatwas website.


Source: Khamenei.ir, accessed March 23, 2015.

Appendix II: Iranian International Law Expert: "Where Is The Iranian Leader's Original Fatwa Banning Nuclear Weapons? And What Does It Say? In Reality, So Far No One Has Claimed To Have Actually Seen The Fatwa"

On July 16, 2014, BBC Persian posted an article titled "Where Is The Iranian Leader's Fatwa Banning Nuclear Weapons?" by Iranian international law expert Bahman Aghai Diba.

In it, Aghai Diba explained that the regime's failure to publish the actual text of the fatwa, coupled with its reliance on a letter by Khamenei to a conference in Tehran, constitute a breach of Shi'ite custom, according to which a published fatwa consists of a question posed to a senior ayatollah together with his reply.

According to Aghai Diba, the failure to post the fatwa on Khamenei's various websites, where detailed descriptions of many of his other fatwas do appear, casts doubt on its existence, and prevents it from being examined for both date and content.[8]

The following are the main points of his article, as translated from the Persian:[9]

"The Iranian government states that the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran does not aspire to use nuclear energy for military purposes, and in order to prove this point they refer to a fatwa or religious ruling by the Iranian Supreme Leader, which allegedly forbids [the use of] weapons of mass destruction.

"Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif has said that Iran will turn this fatwa into a law in order to reassure several states of the civilian nature [of its nuclear program]. The U.S. Secretary of State also said that this fatwa is important, but should become law.

An Iranian foreign ministry spokesman [Afkham] also said, in the past, that the Islamic Republic intends to register this fatwa with the UN.

"But where is the Iranian leader's original fatwa banning nuclear weapons? And what does it say? In reality, so far no one has claimed to have actually seen the fatwa.

"Fatwas have a certain status in Islamic jurisprudence. They have formatting and content requirements. The fatwas are usually in the form of a question asked of a marja' taqlid [the highest jurisprudential authority in Shi'a Islam], and the marja'a gives an answer that is based on Islamic religious sources.

"Keeping in mind that the Iranian leader's fatwa banning nuclear weapons has never been published anywhere, it is not clear what its format and content are. 

Who asked the question ([i.e.] an ordinary person or a jurist[?]) and what formulas and rules from Islamic religious law were used in order to reply to it? For example, does the word haram [forbidden] appear in it, or are conditions for this ban spelled out?

"In accordance with the accepted definition of a fatwa (according to the explanation presented in the existing sources that are known to all), [a fatwa] is: 'A publicly applicable religious law concerning a particular issue that is derived from the four sources [of Islamic law]: the Koran, the Sunnah [i.e. the traditions], ijma [consensus among the clerics], and a logical interpretation of the issue by the marja'.

"It is said that Khamenei's fatwa banning nuclear weapons was issued somewhere around 2005.

On October 31, 2013, Iranian Majlis speaker Ali Larijani said that Iran's Supreme Leader has banned the use of nuclear weapons, and the Iranian government wants to register this [fatwa] as a document in the U.N. This is evidence that at least as of that date this fatwa had not been presented in the form of a document to the U.N. At the same time, there is no precedent in history of the registration of such a fatwa in the U.N.

"When a fatwa is issued by the marja' taqlid, this religious edict reaches the knowledge of the public by various channels. In this day and age, when clerics have extensive means [to publish] both privately and publicly, their fatwas are published on multiple websites, including the official websites of these maraji'. 

Leader Khamenei's rulings and fatwas are presented on his personal and official websites, on almost every subject, in detail and in a very organized manner, and hundreds of other elements [in Iran] also reiterate these fatwas.

"These edicts are [also] organized according to words, languages, and topics. However, such an important fatwa – a fatwa that bans nuclear weapons – on which many high-ranking officials of the Islamic Republic rely appears nowhere in the abovementioned sources.

Its text is not found on any website, nor in any of the numerous collections of the Supreme Leader's publications that are published by the Center for Preserving and Publishing the Works of the Leader, nor in any language.

"However, the inaccessibility of this fatwa prevents it from being examined in order to determine what the ban on weapons of mass destruction is based on.

What extent of mass destruction does it include? When the Iranians and the Iraqis were killed extensively during the Iran-Iraq War (especially owing to Iran's 'human wave' strategy [in which Iran sent masses across minefields]), no marja', including Ayatollah [Ruhollah] Khomeini, issued a fatwa or order to prevent all this slaughter or to define this destruction and slaughter as un-Islamic.

"Ayatollah Khomeini never declared the Iraqi nuclear project 'un-Islamic,' even though it was clearly intended for military use (this [Iraqi] project was stopped by Israel's bombing of the Iraqi nuclear facilities).

"Some sources have tried to say that Khamenei's fatwa is his April 4, 2010 letter to the Disarmament Conference in Tehran, in which he condemned the use of weapons of mass destruction, calling them 'a violation of human rights and a clear example of war crimes.' But this claim is unacceptable, because this letter is not considered a fatwa.

"The fatwa banning nuclear weapons by Iran's Supreme Leader remains shrouded in fog."

Hmmm.....As i said before: If there were such a Fatwa, there would be no need for Hidden nuclear installations'.......Period.


Chuck Schumer: "NO You Can not" Make a deal without Congress !


Chuck Schumer: "NO You Can Not" Make a deal without Congress! (Politico).

Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, one of Capitol Hill’s most influential voices in the Iran nuclear debate, is strongly endorsing passage of a law opposed by President Barack Obama that would give Congress an avenue to reject the White House-brokered framework unveiled last week.

The comments Monday by the Democratic leader-in-waiting illustrate the enormity of the task ahead for President Barack Obama and his team: While there’s no guarantee that Congress would ultimately reject an agreement with Iran, there’s an increasingly bipartisan consensus that Congress should at least have the ability to do so.

This is a very serious issue that deserves careful consideration, and I expect to have a classified briefing in the near future. I strongly believe Congress should have the right to disapprove any agreement and I support the Corker bill which would allow that to occur,” Schumer said in an emailed statement to POLITICO.

Schumer had quietly signed on to a bill allowing congressional review of the Iran deal two weeks ago, but made little fanfare of his co-sponsorship. In a brief statement on Friday, he said only that he’d review the agreement. Hmmmm.....'Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.' - Winston Churchill. Read the full story here.

Sunday, April 5, 2015

The 'Ugly & Naked' truth about the Iran nuclear 'backroom' deal.


The 'Ugly and Naked' truth about the Iran nuclear 'backroom' deal. HT: NCRI.

Following the announcement on the framework agreement reached between the Iranian regime and 5+1 countries in Lausanne, Switzerland, on April 2, state-run news outlets in Iran reported that the joint statement delivered by Mohammad-Javad Zarif and the EU's Federica Mogherini is “neither binding nor does it have any legal implications.

The media note published by the US State Department entitled, “Parameters for a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran's Nuclear Program,” contains glaring differences with the version released by the Iranian regime entitled “Summary of a collection of understandings related to solutions for a comprehensive joint plan of action.”

The DoS asserts its release contains “the key parameters of a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear program that were decided in Lausanne, Switzerland. These elements form the foundation upon which the final text of the JCPOA will be written between now and June 30, and reflect the significant progress that has been made in discussions between the P5+1, the European Union, and Iran.

Important implementation details are still subject to negotiation, and nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. We will work to conclude the JCPOA based on these parameters over the coming months.”

Even assuming that the what the DoS released present the true state of agreement and even assuming that the current Provisionals in the agreement is enough to prevent the Iranian regime pursuing nuclear bomb, there can be no doubt that any presumed retreat by the regime is more than anything the result of facts on the ground, namely:


  • The fear of the Iranian regime from a public revolt. It is now beyond any doubt that the people of Iran, contrary to years of propaganda by the regime and apologists in the West, do not consider the nuclear program as “national pride” and do not even support it. 
  • The regional coalition against the expansion and aggression of the religious fascism ruling Iran in Yemen and operation “Decisive Storm” was a major blow to the regime, further undermining its position in the region. 
  • The fear of adoption of a resolution in the US Senate for further sanction or requiring Senate approval was a decisive element forcing the regime to reluctantly accept certain limits. 
  • The crippling impact of sanction, despite some relaxation as a result of agreed Plan of Action in November 2013.

Nevertheless, a statement of generalities, lacking Khamenei’s signature and official approval, will never block the path to the regime obtaining nuclear weapons nor prevent its intrinsic deception.

Thus, these facts indicates that the only option is to increase the pressure and close all the loopholes.
In addition, the Iranian regime version of the agreement not only is different in substance with what the DoS has published, but it is also defined as a general “understanding” with no “legal bearing.”
The question that needs to be asked is: Is the text released by the Department of State the official text of the agreement? 
Has the Iranian regime officially accepted the terms indicated in that text and is it committed to them? If that is the case, then how can one explain the contradictory elements contained in the regime's official press release? Some of the more obvious contradictions between the Iranian version and the American version have been outlined below:

Legal aspects.
1. The text released by the regime’s Foreign Ministry states, “The document outlining these solutions has no legal bearing and merely contains guidelines set out for preparing and writing down the comprehensive joint plan of action.” Thus, the so-called agreement is downgraded from the outset as a non-binding accord without any legal bearing whatsoever. The DoS release, however, does not explicitly indicate that “this text has no legal bearing.”
Destruction, closure or suspension of nuclear activities
2. The regimes’ press release states, “Within the framework of available solutions, none of the nuclear-related installations and activities would be halted, shut down or suspended, and Iran’s nuclear activities in all nuclear installations, including Natanz, Fordow, Isfahan and Arak will continue.” There is absolutely no such understanding reflected in the DoS version. On the contrary, it says that “Iran has agreed to reduce by approximately two-thirds its installed centrifuges.”
The reference to a “two-third” reduction in the number of centrifuges is rather misleading because there were only 9,000 centrifuges in operation in Iran and the other 10,000 declared centrifuges were not operational even before the Geneva talks and agreement. Initially, the regime was not supposed to have any operational centrifuges. Subsequently, however, western negotiators conceded that Tehran could have several hundred, then 1,500 and now 6,000. This set of facts seems to be incongruent with what has been presented in the DoS statement.

New enrichment installations
3. The English text states, “Iran has agreed to not build any new facilities for the purpose of enriching uranium for 15 years.” There is no mention of this in the Iranian version.
Fordow site
4. The DoS text explicitly says, “Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium at its Fordow facility for at least 15 years.” And “Iran has agreed to not conduct research and development associated with uranium enrichment at Fordow for 15 years.” These phrases effectively mean that the Fordow site will no longer remain as a nuclear site. 
However, the text released by the Iranian Foreign Ministry states, “The Fordow nuclear installation will turn into an advanced nuclear and physics research center.” It adds, “Half of Fordow installations will be allocated to advanced nuclear research and production of persistent isotopes with the help of some of the P5+1 countries, which have important applications in industry, agriculture and medicine.

Enrichment
5. The statement released by the DoS states, “Iran will only enrich uranium at the Natanz facility, with only 5,060 IR-1 first-generation centrifuges for ten years.” 
There is no such indication in the Iranian text regarding the use of only the older (first-generation) centrifuges. Rather, it contains phrases that are not explicitly mentioned in the DoS text. For example, it says, “Machineries in excess of this figure [5,000] and related infrastructure will be consolidated and stored under IAEA supervision as potential replacements for machines that would be damaged during the course of this period. Iran will also be able to allocate its current stockpile of enriched material for production of its nuclear fuel complex or for exports to international markets in exchange for purchasing uranium.”
Advanced centrifuges
6. The DoS statement states, “Iran will not use its IR-2, IR-4, IR-5, IR-6, or IR-8 models to produce enriched uranium for at least ten years Ùˆ . Iran will engage in limited research and development with its advanced centrifuges, according to a schedule and parameters which have been agreed to by the P5+1.” 
The Iranian text, however, says, “Iran will continue its research and developments on advanced machines [centrifuges] and the initial phases and the process of completing the research and development of the IR-4, IR-5 and IR-6 centrifuges will continue for the duration of the ten-year Comprehensive Joint Plan of Action."
Arak reactor
7. The DoS statement states, “Iran has agreed to redesign and rebuild a heavy water research reactor in Arak, based on a design that is agreed to by the P5+1, which will not produce weapons grade plutonium, and which will support peaceful nuclear research and radioisotope production.” 
The regime's release states, “The Arak heavy water reactor will remain intact and will be upgraded and updated by being redesigned. This will be initiated according to a set timetable in the framework of a joint international project managed by Iran. Immediately after the redesign, construction will be started and completed according to a predetermined timetable.
IAEA and PMD

8. The DoS document states, “Iran will implement an agreed set of measures to address the IAEA’s concerns regarding the Possible Military Dimensions (PMD) of its program.” 
There is no reference to this issue in the Iranian text, and in particular there is no mention of the program's PMD.

Additional Protocol
9. Regarding the Addition Protocol, the DoS text states, “Iran has agreed to implement the Additional Protocol of the IAEA, providing the IAEA much greater access and information regarding Iran’s nuclear program, including both declared and undeclared facilities.” 
The regime's release states that Iran will “voluntarily” and “temporarily” implement the Additional Protocol. “The process of ratification of this protocol will continue on the basis of a timetable within the authorities of the President and the Parliament.” Therefore, the entire ratification process depends on the parliament’s approval.
Sanctions
10. The DoS text states, “Iran will receive sanctions relief, if it verifiably abides by its commitments. The architecture of U.S. nuclear-related sanctions on Iran will be retained for much of the duration of the deal and allow for snap-back of sanctions in the event of significant non-performance. All past UN Security Council resolutions on the Iran nuclear issue will be lifted simultaneous with the completion, by Iran, of nuclear-related actions addressing all key concerns (enrichment, Fordow, Arak, PMD and transparency).” 
The regime's release states, “After implementation of the joint plan of action, all UN Security Council resolutions will be lifted and all the multilateral European economic and financial sanctions, as well as the unilateral US sanctions, including financial, banking, insurance, investment and all the various related services including in the fields of oil, gas, petrochemical, and car industry will be annulled."
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...