Greek Defense Minister Speaks Out Forcefully in Alliance with Israel. HT
IMRA.
On February 18, 2016, the Greek Minister of Defense, Panos Kammenos,
addressed an international conference at the Begin-Sadat Center for
Strategic Studies on “Strategic Challenges in the Eastern Mediterranean.”
The conference was co-sponsored by B'nai B'rith International. Kammenos
offered a comprehensive and very forceful articulation of Greece’s view of
the region: Of the dangers of radical Islam, of the problematic behavior of
Turkey, and of his country’s new alliance with Israel. It is worth reading
the full speech, entitled “Greece and the Southeastern Mediterranean: A
Policy for Peace, Stability, and Prosperity.”
For a summary, see Greek defense minister slams Turkey’s ‘hegemonic
ambitions’ in The Jerusalem Post, 21.2.2016.
Greece, which is the only country in the Eastern Mediterranean to be a
member of both the European Union and NATO, a country of strategic
importance for the free seaborne trade and the energy flow to Europe, with a
shipping industry that definitely possesses a global influence , will do
its outmost to achieve this goal.
I will try first to identify the threats to stability that appear in the
Eastern Mediterranean.
Then, I will present the recently undertaken efforts for bilateral and
regional cooperation by Greece.
Finally, I will sketch out some of the basic outlines of our future
policies.
Threats to regional stability
These threats are of state and non-state nature. Obviously the primary
threat is coming from ISIS (Daesh) and its criminal and terrorist
activities.
It is this source of instability that relates to the second, the
war in Syria, which in its turn is related to Turkey’s neo-ottoman,
revisionist and hegemonic ambitions. Other sources of instability I consider
to be the spread of nuclear weapons, asymmetric threats and regional
competition.
Daesh/Jihadism
Daesh is the primary threat to regional stability as it threatens the very
essence of state organization, by proposing a different and obscure form of
social structure and international behaviour. The unique Islamic jihadist
philosophy of Daesh is nihilistic and missionary – refusing any other kind
of truth and any kind of coexistence with anybody who is different. Its
nihilism is barbaric by any ecumenical human standards: slavery of big parts
of population (especially women, national, religious and other minorities),
destruction of art and monuments of universal cultural heritage, export of
hate, terrorism and violence against unarmed civilians.
In terms of Geography, Daesh has already reached the Meditarranean shore, by
expanding its influence in Libya, and by inspiring terrorist actions in
Tunisia.
Thus, besides combating this scourge in the areas under its control,
policies should be adopted and actions undertaken in order to prevent its
growth in Libya. Similarly, states should find ways of coordination and
cooperation in order to stop Daesh-inspired groups and activities in the
Saharan and sub-Saharan Africa.
War in Syria
The war in Syria takes place and evolves on the Mediterranean shore, just
next to Israel and across the sea from Cyprus. First of all, let me clarify
that neither this war, nor the war perpetrated by Daesh, are “clash of
civilisations” types of war. They are wars resulting out of the competition
of regional powers or extremist groups to which I will refer further below.
Consequently, and second, the war in Syria is not a war that has resulted
out of big powers or “Zionist” involvement, as it is usually thought by the
average person of the other side in the region.
It is the result of
competition by other regional powers – NOT Israel, Greece or Egypt –
competing for political, religious and economic influence.
Undoubtedly, the war in Syria must end. The destruction and the suffering
are so extended and so great that its continuation makes no sense and makes
no honour to 21st century humanity. Yet, a viable solution should be found,
in order to avoid solutions and influences of external factors that may harm
regional and international stability. Ending this war will give the
opportunity for reconstruction and for ending the greatest since WWII
humanitarian crisis, which has become so heavy for neighbouring states and
Europe.
In conjunction let me now turn to Turkey.
Turkey is a NATO ally to Greece. Turkey is aspiring to become an EU member
to which the Republic of Cyprus already belongs. Turkey, on the other hand,
for more than a decade benefited from its alliance with Israel.
Yet, its policies and behaviour towards these three democracies are far from
being friendly, far from being in accordance with international law, and far
from being of a stabilizing nature.
Turkey continues its non-ally behaviour towards Greece, by creating
frictions and issues in the Aegean and in the South-Eastern European
environment, and, lately, by deliberately pouring hundreds of thousands of
refugees in the European soil.
It is still maintaining illegally an occupying force in Cyprus, hinders the
progress of negotiations in the island, and tries to block the exploration
and exploitation of natural resources in the Mediterranean.
You in Israel know very well how Turkey behaved in December 2012 and January
2013, when the Republic of Cyprus announced the discovery of hydrocarbons in
the Aphrodite field. You also know about the behaviour towards your country,
its involvement in domestic issues and the support for anti-Israeli
organisations, the fomenting of anti-Semitist feelings in Turkey, its
indiscretions in areas of sensitive information and technologies, and its
maximalistic demands in order to normalize relations with Israel again.
I have to underline what Prime Minister Davutoglu said to his parliamentary
group on December 22:
“
… I felt honoured on behalf of my nation to witness the hoisting of the
Palestinian flag at the United Nations. Inshallah [God willing] that flag
will one day be waved in Jerusalem ... Whatever is wrong for Palestine is
wrong for us too.”
Turkey’s neo-Ottoman ambitions expand, as you very well know, from
Bosnia-Herzegovina to the Mediterranean southern shore.
Turkey has hindered
the 2003 allied operations in Iraq, and has undermined the UN embargo
against Iran.
Worst, it has initially allowed the formation of Daesh, by
permitting the passage of extremists from all over the world going to fight
for this Organization and the transfer of weapons; then, it has hospitalized
jihadists, it has undermined the efforts of the West to fight Daesh, it has
bombed the Kurdish forces fighting against it, and traded with them, thus
strengthening them.
Moreover, after for many long years trading with Syria, training units of
Syria’s army and after the Erdogan family spent vacations with Assad, it has
been involved in the Syrian war against the Assad regime. Last, but not
least, it has tried to create an international crisis between NATO and
Russia, by downing the Russian aircraft, and now it also hinders the
progress of the peace talks in Geneva.
Nuclear proliferation
Greece is observing the issue of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East
and the Mediterranean shore with great discomfort. The agreement on the
Iranian nuclear program, whether one like it or not, is for the moment a
reality, and what is important is the monitoring of the agreement’s full
implementation.
More important is to monitor how this agreement and the medium-term
perspective of a nuclear Iran are going to be perceived also by its regional
competitors. In fact such a perspective gives important incentives also to
Turkey to go nuclear. As you all know, Turkey has nuclear ambitions that
were made public in the AKP’s program, before the 2002 elections. Turkey as
it is publicly known, wants to build two nuclear energy power facilities,
one in Akkuyu and the other in Sinopi on dangerous seismic ground. Of course
right now it is not certain how fast the construction is going to proceed,
given the frictions with Russia.
What is important, however, is that the
ambition is there.
Regional power competition
This is another threat to regional stability. It is interesting that the
regional competition is primarily between Muslim states, and is expressed in
two conflicts, the one in Syria and the other in Yemen.
It is characteristic
that in both conflicts Turkey has sided with Saudi Arabia, while in terms of
religious influence over the Muslims in Europe, Turkey is competing with
Saudi Arabia.
Of course, this competition and these conflicts are often wrapped up in the
paper of primarily religious competition. Yet, it may be seen that Turkey,
Iran, and Saudi Arabia are competing for supremacy in the region and within
the Muslim world, each one pretending being and projecting a different model
of state organization, and each one promoting its own economic interests,
often related with hydrocarbons and pipelines.
The competition is also expressed in the arms race between the three, with
relevant weapons programs and very high defence spending. In the last ten
years Saudi Arabia (first) and Turkey (second), and in some years Iran
(third), is each one spending in constant prices more than Israel, to which
an effective defence is an absolute condition of survival. Other, smaller
Gulf States are also participating in this arms race, as is the case of
Qatar, recording a very high per capita defence spending. And the questions
are, where this competition with Iran is going to lead the Sunni alliance,
and against who are they going to turn, once the two conflicts are over.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Greece, Israel and Cyprus do not aspire to create or participate in an axis
of evil. We have seen and continue to see the consequences of confrontation,
extremism and war.
Our aim is to create, together with all those who share the same values and
principles and without exclusions, an arc of stability, cooperation and
prosperity extending from the broader East Mediterranean area to the Black
Sea and beyond.
Our adversaries are not states or peoples and religions, but extreme
ideologies and inhuman practices which incite hatred and destruction.
Our strategic priority is to create a better place for our peoples and
future generations to live in peace, security and prosperity.
An area of cooperation and progress.
Our East Mediterranean, has been a cradle of great civilizations, of
religious tolerance and coexistence and it can certainly become a
springboard towards a better future mainly for our youth.
We should not allow any more lost opportunities, no more lost generations. Read the full story
here.
