Showing posts with label Turkey Iran's lifeline. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Turkey Iran's lifeline. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

U.S. Judge Wants To Know If Iran or Turkey Paying Lawyers In Reza Zarrab Iran Sanctions Case.


U.S. Judge Wants To Know If Iran or Turkey Paying Lawyers In Reza Zarrab Iran Sanctions Case.(rferl).

A U.S. judge said he wants to know whether Iran employs any lawyers for a wealthy Turkish-Iranian gold trader accused of helping Tehran evade U.S. sanctions.

In an order on Mary 1, Manhattan District Judge Richard Berman said he planned to ask at a hearing on May 2 whether former New York Mayor and Trump adviser Rudolph Giuliani or any other lawyer for trader Reza Zarrab had been hired by Iran or Turkey.

The hearing will focus on whether conflicts of interest bar Giuliani and former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey from representing Zarrab. The trader has pleaded not guilty to U.S. charges that he directed a conspiracy to launder money through U.S. banks on behalf of Iran's government in violation of U.S. sanctions.

Giuliani and Mukasey say they were hired to try to negotiate a political resolution of his case between the United States and Turkey.

The attorneys have discussed Zarrab's case with U.S. authorities and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has accused U.S. authorities of having "ulterior motives" in bringing the charges.

In an affidavit last month, Giuliani said authorities in both countries were "receptive" to a diplomatic deal.


Way more information on the Iranian Lifeline By Obama's BFF Erdogan can be read on WashingtonPoint his account, recomended reading if you want the truth.

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Turkey’s Erdogan undermines NATO and it's allies.


Turkey’s Erdogan undermines NATO and it's allies. HT : abdullahbozkurtblog
The other lawmaker, Çakmak, recalled his private conversation he had recently had with Erdoğan who said “when I get a chance, I know what to do with NATO, Europe and Israel. I’m going to f..k their mothers. NATO and the US are as terrorists as Israel.”
The deepening confidence crisis between Turkey and the NATO allies that has now reached to a breaking point after the staged coup bid of July 15 of last year that effectively purged most, if not all, pro-NATO officers from Turkish military has its roots tracing back to diverging interests of Turkey’s Islamist rulers who harbor a political vision that is in clear contradiction of the values and principles of the military alliance that was enshrined in its charter.

Turkey, led by an authoritarian leader Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has time and again surprised NATO allies in several cases which tested the spirit of solidarity in the military alliance’s collective security.

In May 2010, Turkish diplomat at the United Nations Security Council was instructed to cast a no vote to fresh sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program in the last-minute order from then Prime Minister and now president of Turkey, Erdoğan. The original order was to abstain from the vote in the UN Security Council where Turkey was serving as non-permanent member but that was changed at the 11th hour, making Turkey one of the two countries that voted no to the sanction resolution.

The corruption investigations of Dec.2013 that exposed how Erdoğan was in bed with Iranian sanction-busters in moving billions of dollars of Iran’s state funds in exchange for bribes and commissions explained the real reason why Erdoğan personally intervened to support Iran at the expense of Turkey’s allies at the UN. It has nothing to do with mediation efforts along with Brazil. But rather, a young Iranian businessman, Reza Zarrab, was able to buy his access to the power structure of Turkey’s leadership including Erdoğan and his wife.

The meeting held on Oct.19, 2010 in Istanbul’s Çamlıca hill that overlooks Bosporus and attended by Seracettin Karayağız, a deputy from Muş province, and Hayrettin Çakmak, a deputy from Bursa province.

The conversation was about the NATO early radar warning system to be deployed in Malatya’s Kürecik district as part of NATO’s missile defense system. Lawmaker Karayağız said that Erdoğan is no longer allowing the Iranian border to be used as a garrison for the US, Israel and Europe and resisted efforts to that end by Turkey’s allies. He said Erdoğan was really strengthening political, economic and military ties with Iran and saw the radar system as a trap to derail that process. The other lawmaker, Çakmak, recalled his private conversation he had recently had with Erdoğan who said “when I get a chance, I know what to do with NATO, Europe and Israel. I’m going to f..k their mothers. NATO and the US are as terrorists as Israel.” Read the full story here.


Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Unregistered cash to Turkey up 52 pct in 9 months, after cash no longer subject to laundering checks.


Unregistered cash to Turkey up 52 pct in 9 months, after cash no longer subject to laundering checks. (TZ).

The amount of unregistered money, the origin of which is unknown, that entered Turkish markets in the first nine months of 2015 skyrocketed by 52 percent compared to a year ago, central bank data revealed on Wednesday.

Turkey saw unregistered cash entering its markets reach $13.44 billion between January and September of 2015. This figure was $8.87 billion in the same period of 2014. Hmmmm......Erdogan Obama's BFF. Read the full story here.

RELATED: 
'What's your Jihad?' - Cash entering 'Islamist' Turkey no longer subject to laundering checks

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Belgian Kurdish Institute sends open letter to Belgian king to display it's indignation of Erdogan reception.

Belgian Kurdish Institute.[GoogleTranslated].

Yesterday, Sunday, October 4th, the Turkish President Erdoğan landed in Zaventem for a state visit, met with the European institutions and the opening of the Europalia cultural event, where Turkey is host. Moreover, he today receives from the hands of King Philip the Groontlint in the Order of Leopold.

Erdoğan put at the moment everything possible to get a majority in parliament to re-election on November 1 for his AKP so he can install an authoritarian presidential system. To achieve this, he tries the Kurdish movement, the HDP (Democratic Peoples Party, ed) a huge profit booked by eliminating the elections of 7 June.

Last summer, the conflict between the PKK and the Turkish army, thereby again erupted in full force.Almost every day people die. In addition Erdoğan has given orders to shoot everything from a distance looks like a PKK guerrilla. Thereby leaving many innocent people, including women and children, life.

Not only the Kurds, but the whole Turkish society is suffering under the rule of Erdoğan. Freedom of speech is restricted and journalists threatened and democracy and secularism have to make way for a conservative-Islamic ideology.

This weekend leaked terrible images filmed in the Kurdish city of Sirnak, which shows how a Turkish armored vehicle drags the corpse of a young Kurd behind him through the streets. This kind of atrocities similar to the methods IS uses in its conquest area, are no exception and done with conscious knowledge of Erdoğan.

To express our outrage, we sent the following letter to the prime minister, the ministers of interior and foreign affairs and presidents of chambers and Senate.

Dear,

This Sunday you will receive Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as part of an official state visit. Moreover, Erdogan will be inducted into the Order of Leopold by King Philip.

We insist to inform you that on the hand that you will shake Sunday the blood of hundreds of innocent civilians is attached, including dozens of minors and the elderly. Erdoğan is executing a murderous terror campaign against the Kurds, which is by the electoral success of the HDP on June 7 the last obstacle in his plan to change the Turkish Constitution.

He is the person who is guilty of the bloody actions of the police in Gezipark, the military operation and the destruction of the towns of Cizre and Nusaybin, violence against journalists and the arrest of thousands of members of the HDP (Democratic Peoples Party) and other civilian organizations.
The purpose of Erdogan is no less than installing an authoritarian, conservative-Islamist, as new presidential power in the Middle East. To achieve this, he would walk over corpses, from reining in of free speech to provide support to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

You have as official representatives of the Belgian state and democracy the duty to admonish this man. Erdoğan is a threat to Turkey and the Middle East, but also for Europe and Belgium. It is thanks to the negligent attitude of the Turkish army along the border with Syria that many European IS fighters, sometimes in groups, so easily get back and forth across the border.

We are appalled to learn that the person who is responsible for so much pain and sadness to the Kurdish people will receive the Grand Cordon of the Order of Leopold. Not only for the more than 50,000 Belgian citizens of Kurdish origin, but for all by you delegated citizens who strive for global humanitarianism and democracy, this is a stab in the heart.

We hope you took note of our sincere indignation.
Yours sincerely,
Derwich Ferhat,
Chairman Kurdish Institute of Brussels

Monday, October 5, 2015

Erdoğan’s son allegedly sent to Italy with billions in case family has to flee.



Ceausescu palace we all remember how he 'went'

Erdoğan’s son allegedly sent to Italy with billions in case family has to flee. HT: Bugun.

In the latest series of tweets by government whistleblower Fuat Avni, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s son Bilal has allegedly been snuck into Italy with armed guards, in the event the Erdoğan clan must flee Turkey over possible treason charges.

“Noticing that he’s nearing the end of the road, [President Erdoğan] has ordered Bilal to ‘quietly’ leave the country in the company of armed guards. The destination for Bilal and the considerable amount of money with him is Italy,” government whistleblower and Twitter phenomenon Fuat Avni revealed in a series of tweets on Monday.

Fuat Avni has been a thorn in the side of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the Justice and Development Party’s (AK Party) for nearly two years now, having correctly revealed many of their top secret plans.

President Erdoğan has allegedly been worried by an internal investigation file, which establishes that he could be tried for treason – the only crime for which a Turkish president can undergo prosecution.

The investigation file implicates Erdoğan for his involvement with the Kurdish settlement process, and has prompted the president to send his son out of the country.

Avni claimed that Bilal Erdoğan flew to Italy on Sept. 27, and that the plan includes the possibility of his extended stay, allowing him to take in other family members if required.

While there, he is also expected to tend to the family’s bank accounts in Switzerland and other countries, managing billions of dollars in family finances. He will be staying in the vicinity of Lake Como, near the Swiss border, giving him easy access to Swiss banks.

The family will decide whether or not Bilal will return depending on the situation that emerges from the Nov. 1 snap election. Hmmm......Latest opinion poll shows Turkey’s AKP still below June election results.Read the full story here.

Thursday, May 7, 2015

'What's your Jihad?' - Cash entering 'Islamist' Turkey no longer subject to laundering checks.


'What's your Jihad?' - Cash entering 'Islamist' Turkey no longer subject to laundering checks. (TZ).

A recent circular issued by the Ministry of Customs and Trade has relaxed customs checks on those entering Turkey so that passengers will no longer be subject to prosecution over suspected money laundering and terrorism financing, a daily claimed on Friday.

According to a report published in the Hürriyet daily, if passengers are found to have made false declarations regarding the amount of cash they have with them when entering the country, they will no longer be referred to public prosecutors on suspicion of money laundering, terrorism financing and violation of the law protecting the value of the Turkish lira.

“Revenues from the export of goods and services, revenues with regard to transit trade, cash from foreign capital and other resources are free to enter the country through custom gates. [The value of] the items is not required to be declared and passengers cannot be forced to make declarations,” the circular said, while adding that people are free to declare the amount of money to customs officials.


In addition to the circular contradicting another issued in 2008 by the same ministry, which obliged travelers entering Turkey to declare the sum of money he or she is carrying if it is more than 10,000 euros, it also fuels worries that it is creating a loophole in the law that may pave the way for money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities. 2008's circular had also said that the arrangement was in line with the EU's efforts to fight against money laundering and terrorism.

Hürriyet also quoted a customs examiner in its report, saying: “It was a must to declare [the amount of] all kinds of money entering the country before 2004. In the ensuing years, this rule has been eased via circulars. It seems that scrutiny over the amount and source of cash has been abolished with the recent note. This circular may also lead to the repayment of money that was seized in [smuggling or laundering] prosecutions in past years. Legislation preventing money laundering would also be broken with this circular. The same circular may even apply to gold inflow as well as cash." Hmmmm.....'Islamist' Turkey Iran's 'officially' Obama 'admin' approved 'lifeline' of terrorists.

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

'Advanced Islamist Democracy' Turkey, the 'Lifeline' of Iran thanks to Obama 'admin' inaction?


'Advanced Islamist Democracy' Turkey, the 'Lifeline' of Iran thanks to Obama 'admin' inaction? (Foundation for Defense of Democracies).

Jonathan Schanzer April 22, 2015.

Between 2012 and 2013, Turkey was purchasing Iranian natural gas in Turkish lira and transferring the proceeds to Halkbank accounts that Iranian gold traders used to buy gold in Turkey. The gold was subsequently shipped off to Dubai and then Iran.

At the time, Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan unabashedly explained that his country’s gold exports to Iran worked like “payments for our natural gas purchases.”

From Turkey’s perspective, there was no reason to hide the arrangement. The sale of gold was technically legal because the sales were going to individuals, not the government of Iran. And trade with individuals was not, at the time, in violation of sanctions.

Still, once the scheme was discovered, 47 members of Congress demanded an explanation from Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew.

The Obama administration and Congress adopted new legislation in January 2013 imposing a blanket prohibition on all gold sales to Iran. Inexplicably, however, the administration did not make the prohibition effective immediately; the sanctions only became effective six months later, on July 1, 2013.

By forestalling the imposition of the sanctions, the White House granted Turkey and Iran additional months of trading opportunities. According to a report by FDD’s executive director Mark Dubowitz and our colleagues at Roubini Global Economics, “Iran’s Golden Loophole” allowed Tehran to receive over $13 billion before “gas-for-gold” slowed to a trickle.

A massive corruption scandal that erupted last year suggests that Turkish government figures were involved in yet another massive scheme that processed an additional €87 billion in illicit transactions. The Turkish government has quashed all investigations into this scheme, which included gold traders in Istanbul, UAE money traders, Iranian and Chinese banks, and an astounding list of high-level officials.

However, Turkey’s illicit financial activity does not end there.

Ankara’s desire to bring down the Assad regime in Syria has led to inexcusable policies that have enabled the growth of jihadist groups like Jabhat al-Nusra (JN) and the Islamic State (IS). Hmmm...........Hussein Obama's BFF Erdogan.Read the full report here.

Saturday, April 11, 2015

How Obama's BFF 'Islamist' Turkey will benefit from lifting of Iran sanctions


How Obama's BFF 'Islamist' Turkey will benefit from lifting of Iran sanctions. (AA).

Riza Eser, chairman of the Turkey-Iran Business Council, said the $13.7 billion volume of trade in 2014 could climb to $30 billion in two years.

Turkey also buys crude oil from Iran, which owns 10% of global oil reserves. Iran was meeting 51% of Turkey’s oil demand, but the import patterns have changed with the embargo and US pressure on Turkey to curtail its oil purchases from Iran and the beginning of oil flow from northern Iraq to Turkey’s Ceyhan. Imports from Iran declined to 28.5% of Turkey’s oil purchases, while the oil bought from Iraq went up to 32% from 10%, making northern Iraq Turkey's main supplier of oil.

According to the ministry, about a hundred Turkish companies are active in Tehran. In Tabriz, 38 Turkish investments are active in the country’s only foreign investment zone. Forty percent of Iran’s population are Azeris of Turkic origin. Turkish television programs are watched widely all over the country, meaning a large segment of the population speaks Turkish and is interested in Turkish products.

The current Preferential Trade Agreement will also help expand the volume of trade to Iran, raising hopes of higher sales of goods, chemicals, automotive products and iron-steel products  Hmmmm....Turkey was always the 'lifeline' of Iran with the knowledge of the Obama 'Admin' they should never have received a oil waiver. While making life more difficult for EU firms they made sure 'Islamist' Turkey could benefit. Read the full story here.

 U.S. exempts seven countries that consume Iran oil from sanctions.
Obama administration officials didn't say how much the seven countries had cut their oil purchases. In March, U.S. officials signaled that they were seeking reductions of 15% to 22% of purchases.

Several large countries, including India and Turkey, said publicly that they were reluctant to reduce imports of Iranian oil because of their long reliance on the Islamic regime. They appear to have met the minimum level of cooperation that Washington demanded, however.How Much did Turkey actually 'reduce' it's inports??

Answer:
Before May, Turkey was the only buyer in Europe to increase purchases from Iran, while other European refiners cut back on imports of the crude ahead of an impending EU oil embargo due to take effect from July 1.In the first four months of 2012, Turkey imported 210,000 barrels per day of Iranian oil on average, including a huge 270,000 bpd in March, much higher than its 2011 average of 185,000 bpd. 

In May Turkey's state-controlled refining company, Tupras, imported around 140,000 barrels per day (bpd), a 20 percent drop from its 2011 average, according to the latest shipping data, obtained by Reuters. Port data showed 152,000 tonnes of Iranian crude was delivered to the port of Aliaga in May, while 443,000 tonnes of Iranian crude was delivered to its second import terminal, Tutunciflik. Tupras is expected to import the same volume in June.
From July 1, Turkey will remain effectively the sole buyer of Iranian crude in Europe. Official trade data showed that in the first four months of this year, Iran accounted for about 58 percent of Turkey's near 6 million tonnes in total crude imports. 
THIS REDUCTION IS A PURE SMOKESCREEN APPROVED BY THE OBAMA ADMIN!

Saturday, April 4, 2015

U.S. Treasury affirms that sanctions on Iran remain in force, as does the JPOA sanctions relief


U.S. Treasury affirms that sanctions on Iran remain in force, as does the JPOA sanctions relief. (USGov).

Guidance Relating to the April 2, 2015 Announcement of Parameters for a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program


  • The parameters announced on April 2, 2015 for a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) by the P5+1 and Iran do not immediately relieve, suspend or terminate any sanctions on Iran. The only sanctions relief in force is the relief provided pursuant to the Joint Plan of Action (JPOA) reached on November 24, 2013 and extended through June 30, 2015.


  • The parameters announced on April 2, 2015 provide a path for sanctions on Iran to be suspended and eventually terminated in exchange for IAEA verified implementation by Iran of its key nuclear commitments.


  • As of today and until a JCPOA is concluded, other than the sanctions relief provided under the JPOA, all U.S. sanctions remain in place and will continue to be vigorously enforced.


  • The sanctions relief provided for under the JPOA reached on November 24, 2013 remains in effect, as described in published Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions​.      Hmmmm......Bottom line, 'Obama's BFF 'Islamist' Turkey remains Iran's 'lifeline'.

Thursday, March 26, 2015

To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran! John Bolton.



To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran! John Bolton. (NYT).

FOR years, experts worried that the Middle East would face an uncontrollable nuclear-arms race if Iran ever acquired weapons capability. Given the region’s political, religious and ethnic conflicts, the logic is straightforward.

As in other nuclear proliferation cases like India, Pakistan and North Korea, America and the West were guilty of inattention when they should have been vigilant. But failing to act in the past is no excuse for making the same mistakes now. All presidents enter office facing the cumulative effects of their predecessors’ decisions. But each is responsible for what happens on his watch. President Obama’s approach on Iran has brought a bad situation to the brink of catastrophe.

In theory, comprehensive international sanctions, rigorously enforced and universally adhered to, might have broken the back of Iran’s nuclear program. But the sanctions imposed have not met those criteria. Naturally, Tehran wants to be free of them, but the president’s own director of National Intelligence testified in 2014 that they had not stopped Iran’s progressing its nuclear program. There is now widespread acknowledgment that the rosy 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, which judged that Iran’s weapons program was halted in 2003, was an embarrassment, little more than wishful thinking.

Even absent palpable proof, like a nuclear test, Iran’s steady progress toward nuclear weapons has long been evident. Now the arms race has begun: Neighboring countries are moving forward, driven by fears that Mr. Obama’s diplomacy is fostering a nuclear Iran. Saudi Arabia, keystone of the oil-producing monarchies, has long been expected to move first. No way would the Sunni Saudis allow the Shiite Persians to outpace them in the quest for dominance within Islam and Middle Eastern geopolitical hegemony. Because of reports of early Saudi funding, analysts have long believed that Saudi Arabia has an option to obtain nuclear weapons from Pakistan, allowing it to become a nuclear-weapons state overnight. Egypt and Turkey, both with imperial legacies and modern aspirations, and similarly distrustful of Tehran, would be right behind.

Ironically perhaps, Israel’s nuclear weapons have not triggered an arms race. Other states in the region understood — even if they couldn’t admit it publicly — that Israel’s nukes were intended as a deterrent, not as an offensive measure.

Iran is a different story. Extensive progress in uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing reveal its ambitions. Saudi, Egyptian and Turkish interests are complex and conflicting, but faced with Iran’s threat, all have concluded that nuclear weapons are essential. Read the full story here.

Video - Kerry 'i will implement pres Obama's vision of the World' Criticizes Iran Talks Critics

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Proposed 'garage sale' Deal with Iran Not Legal.


Proposed 'garage sale' Deal with Iran Not Legal. HT: Gatestone.

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) forbids any of its signatories to have nuclear weapons. Full stop.

The P5+1 have been attempting to amend the NPT without going through the process established by the NPT itself -- and attempting to do this for just one of its 190 signatories: Iran.

Under the terms of the NPT, the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, plus Germany) have no legal authority to amend the treaty unilaterally, to abrogate the treaty, or to allow nations that are signatories to the NPT to abrogate the treaty. The NPT can only be changed through a review conference of all parties. All changes agreed to after that must be consented to by the signatory nations, according to their own legal requirements.

The rules, therefore, ever since the U.S. Senate consented to the treaty in 1969, are that the Senate would have to approve any change to the treaty. Otherwise, any nation that is a signatory to the NPT could say that it is no longer bound by the terms of the agreement and decide to have their own nuclear weapons capability --- as many have already stated they would do, starting with Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.

If Iran is allowed by the P5+1 to violate the NPT, not only will it have nuclear weapons capability with impunity, but also lifted sanctions, and a strong economy that will enable it go on expanding its reach, while remaining the world's largest promoter of terrorism. As there already is an internationally agreed-upon law totally forbidding Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons -- even if Iran were fully to cooperate -- which, considering its proven track-record, is doubtful -- why does anyone need yet another agreement to stop Tehran's nuclear program?

Why is the international community not simply enforcing the current NPT?

Iran has already violated so many provisions of the NPT that the UN Security Council and the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) imposed a second protocol requirement on Tehran, to ensure that it abides by the 1970 treaty. The second protocol was also intended to ensure that, in the event of violations, major economic sanctions were imposed Iran by key members of the international community, including and most importantly the United States.

Iran has not abided by the second protocol of the NPT, either. Iran continues to spin its centrifuges and enrich uranium, while demanding that all sanctions immediately be ended.

Instead of simply requiring Iran to live up to its obligations under the NPT -- signed and ratified by Tehran in 1968 and 1970, respectively -- the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany are trying to give Iran a special deal. How special?

Well, the P5+1 have proposed unilaterally to amend the NPT -- just for Iran, no other nation. If Iran is allowed nuclear weapons capability, other nations -- including in South America, already infiltrated by Iran -- will doubtless follow suit.

The P5+1 would allow Iran, while still a member of the NPT, permanently to enrich uranium and produce plutonium in return for agreeing for some number of years (possibly ten), not to enrich "too much." There is, however, no "right to enrich" at all under the NPT or any other law, contrary to some misinformed "conventional wisdom." Hmmm......The only one willing to give the enrichment is.....the Obama 'admin' Read the full story here.


Obama's new BFF 'Moderate & Transparent' Iran Rules Out Snap Nuclear Inspections.


Obama's new BFF 'Moderate and Transparent' Iran Rules Out Snap Nuclear Inspections. (rferl).

An Iranian official has reacted to comments by the head of the UN nuclear agency demanding snap inspections of Iran's nuclear sites.

Six world powers and Iran are facing an end-of-the-month deadline to reach a framework agreement to limit Tehran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Tehran denies it is developing a nuclear weapon, as the West suspects.

Earlier this month Yukiya Amano, the head of the the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said Tehran should agree to snap inspections to reassure the international community.

Iran's nuclear spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said Amano's comments harm the delicate negotiations.

"It would be much better if Amano only talked about the IAEA's seasonal and monthly reports," he said, according to state TV on March 24.

Among the unresolved issues meant to be part of an agreement is a ruling by the IAEA on whether Iran worked on nuclear arms in the past. Tehran denies that, but the agency says it has information suggesting otherwise. Hmmm....they're lying and hiding the truth and no back room deals can hide this. Read the full story here.


Obama's BFF Iran isn’t being forthright at all, says nuclear watchdog.


Obama's BFF Iran isn’t being forthright, says nuclear watchdog. (Wapo).

With the deadline nearing for international talks on constraining Iran’s nuclear program, Yukiya Amano, director general of the IAEA, said in an interview that Iran has replied to just one of a dozen queries about “possible military dimensions” of past nuclear activities.

Amano said that Iran has provided only “very limited” information about two other issues, while the rest have not been addressed at all. “Recently, the progress is very limited,” he said.

Yukiya Amano, director general of the IAEA, explained that Iran has only replied to one of a dozen queries about “possible military dimensions” of past nuclear activities. Amano also said that any deal with Iran should include a provision that would allow all IAEA inspectors to go anywhere at any time to examine sites that may have nuclear weapons.

Amano said that near the top of his list of unanswered questions about possible military dimensions of Iranian nuclear activities was the Parchin military complex. He said that the IAEA has information that Iran conducted experiments in a high-explosive chamber there.

“We would like to have access, and we would like to clarify,” Amano said.

He said Iran had twice given IAEA inspectors access to the base, but he added that Parchin “is a huge area with many buildings.” Now, he said, the IAEA thinks it has identified “the right place to visit,” but its access has been blocked. Hmmmm...... Obama's/Kerry's claim that "Iran is in compliance and fully cooperating" is a fat lie. Read the full story here.



Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Iranian Journalist: Proponents Of The Deal With Iran Rely On A Fatwa By Khamenei Nobody Has Ever Seen


Iranian Journalist: Proponents Of The Deal With Iran Rely On A Fatwa By Khamenei Nobody Has Ever Seen. (Memri).

Amir Taheri, a Paris-based Iranian author and journalist, argued in a similar vein that American proponents of the deal with Iran base their position on groundless assumptions, including on the claim that Khamenei issued a fatwa banning nuclear weapons – a fatwa that nobody has ever seen.

The following are excerpts from a translation of his article published in the English edition of Al-Sharq Al-Awsat:[3]

"Campaigning for a deal on the Iranian nuclear issue, the pro-mullah lobby in the West, especially in the United States, often cites three claims in support of President Barack Obama's appeasement of Tehran. The first is that a deal will help the 'reformist' wing of the regime led by former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani—which already controls the presidency through Hassan Rouhani—to capture other levers of power and embark on a genuine program of change aimed at returning Iran to normality. Rafsanjani is cast as a moderate, a turbaned version of Deng Xiaoping, capable of closing the chapter of the revolution and forging business-like relations with the US.

Much is made of Rafsanjani's recent statements that he has always favored collective leadership and that once the Supreme Guide Ali Khamenei is shown the door, he would press for a collegial system and the end of 'one-man rule' in Iran.

"The first step in that direction was supposed to come last Monday when Rafsanjani sought to get himself elected president of the Assembly of Experts... Capturing [it] was supposed to be the first step in a victorious march that would enable the Rafsanjani faction to win control of the Islamic Consultative Assembly or Majlis, the 290-member ersatz parliament.

However the Assembly of Experts elected Ayatollah Muhammad Yazdi—one of Rafsanjani's oldest foes and a close associate of Khamenei—as its new president with 47 votes to 24.

The Rafsanjani faction's hopes of winning control of the parliament next year are unlikely to prove any better. Several polls show that even if the faction manages to mobilize all those who voted for Rouhani—33 percent of those eligible to vote—it still would not be enough to secure a majority of the 230 seats on offer.

"The second claim, paradoxically, is built on a fatwa supposedly issued by Khamenei forbidding the use of nuclear weapons.

Thus, while Obama hopes that Rafsanjani will eventually evict Khamenei, he is basing his policy on a fatwa issued by the latter. Since no one, and certainly not Obama, has seen the fatwa in question it is hard to assess its political importance. However in real terms the fatwa, supposing it does exist, is nothing more than an opinion and is thus devoid of legal authority.

"The third claim is that the nuclear project is popular with the Iranian people and that by accepting a nuclear Iran the US would gain popularity there. However, ultimately there is no evidence to back that claim.

The issue has never been properly discussed in any public forum, not even in the Majlis. In fact, successive governments, including under the Shah, have suppressed a number of reports warning against the dangers of a nuclear project, especially with reference to the threat that earthquakes pose to nuclear installations on almost all parts of the Iranian Plateau...


"Obama's hope is that by making a deal he will enable Rafsanjani's 'moderate' faction to win the power struggle in Tehran and initiate a change of behavior by the Khomeinist regime.  That, many agree, is nothing but an illusion.

In his address to the US Congress, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also seemed to share this sentiment. As Aristotle observed 25 centuries ago, character is action. In other words: You are what you do! 

A regime's nature dictates its behavior. As Sa'adi Shirazi—the famous poet of Shiraz—noted almost eight centuries ago, a scorpion does not sting because it wants to be a bad boy; it does so in accordance with its nature." Hmmm.....By the way, If there were an invisible Fatwa, there would be no need for hidden facilities.

Related:   Don’t Misunderstand Khamenei’s Nuclear Fatwa.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Turkish president Erdogan to visit Iran soon


Turkish president Erdogan to visit Iran soon. (TAZ).

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will pay a visit to Iran in the near future, Iran's Communications and Information Technology Minister Mahmoud Vaezi said Feb.3.

Vaezi, who is the co-chairs the Iran-Turkey Joint Commission for Economic Co-operation said bilateral trade between two countries is $15 billion, but both sides are keen to double that.

Iran and Turkey's presidents have met four times since mid-2013, when President Hassan Rouhani took office.

"Iran wants to increase the number of common banks and banking relations with Turkey," Vaezi added.

According to the Iranian minister, a second railroad between Iran and Turkey is to be inaugurated in near future as well. He didn't mentioned any exact time, but said that during next week an Iranian delegation would visit Turkey to discuss petrochemical products and glass export tariffs. Hmmm....What would be the odds for the Hamas leadership to visit Iran As well at the same time?

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Human Rights Watch World Report 2015: Turkey.


Human Rights Watch World Report 2015: Turkey.  Human Rights Watch


Freedom of Expression, Association, and Assembly
The government’s erosion of media freedom continued. Readiness to limit freedom of expression, restrictive approach to freedom of assembly, and readiness to prosecute demonstrators while tolerating police violence against them, were among features most damaging to Turkey’s democratic credentials and international reputation during the year.
The government responded to the use of social media to disseminate leaked phone calls implicating ministers and family members in corruption by tightening the already restrictive Internet law and blocking Twitter and YouTube in Turkey for several weeks, prompting a joint statement in March from three United Nations special rapporteurs. Both sites were reopened in April and May respec- tively after the Constitutional Court ruled against the blocking orders.
The clampdown included a rise in broadcasting watchdog disciplinary fines applied selectively to anti-government media, criminal defamation cases against journalists, the firing of some prominent journalists, and blocking orders on par- ticular accounts and content on social media. Through these measures, the government is impeding the ability or likelihood of media to hold government authorities to account or to scrutinize their activities.
In the year after the Taksim Gezi Park protests in Istanbul and anti-government protests in other cities across Turkey, thousands of demonstrators faced legal proceedings. In some cases the courts acquitted defendants at the first hearing, but other trials continued at time of writing. Some defendants charged with ter- rorism offenses and still on trial spent up to 10 months in pretrial detention be- fore being bailed.
In June, the trial began of five organizers of Taksim Solidarity, a platform of 128 nongovernmental organizations supporting the Gezi Park campaign and sit-in. They were charged with forming a criminal gang, inciting and participating in un- lawful demonstrations, and refusing orders to disperse. Their trial with 21 codefendants continued at time of writing. In September, an Istanbul prosecutor indicted 35 people associated with the Beşiktaş football club fan group Çarşı for their participation in the Gezi protests on a range of charges including an al- leged coup attempt against the government.
Trials continued of Kurdish political activists, journalists, students, and lawyers on widely used terrorism charges such as “membership of an armed organiza- tion.” The evidence against them in most cases concerned nonviolent political association and protest.
However, in March the government took the welcome steps of abolishing the Special Heavy Penal courts whose remit was terrorism offenses, and cutting the maximum period for pretrial detention to 5 years (from 10), resulting in the re- lease on bail of many defendants. Among those bailed were hundreds of defen- dants tried for alleged links to the outlawed Union of Kurdistan Communities (KCK), including human rights defender Muharrem Erbey, bailed in April after spending over four years in pretrial detention on terrorism charges. The abusive application of terrorism charges remains a serious problem.
Judicial Independence
Turkey has long-standing defects in its justice sytem including concerns over ju- dicial independence, inadequate investigations into abuses by state actors, ex- cessive length of proceedings, and politically motivated prosecutions.
Developments in 2014 highlighted the politicization of Turkey’s judiciary. In re- sponding to the corruption investigations, the government asserted that follow- ers of the Gülen movement were strongly represented in the judiciary and police.
In the name of reducing the alleged influence of the Gülen movement in the jus- tice system, the government took steps to bring the police, prosecutors, and judges under greater executive control. The government oversaw the mass reas- signment or demotion of judges, prosecutors, and police, including all those in- volved in the corruption investigations. It adopted a law in February to restructure the Higher Board of Judges and Prosecutors (Hâkimler ve Savcılar Yüksek Kurulu, HSYK) responsible for the administration of the judiciary, to tie it closer to the executive, and created in July a new category of criminal judges of the peace responsible for key decisions at the criminal investigation stage.
In April, the Constitutional Court partially quashed key provisions of the HSYK law concerning enhanced powers for the Minister of Justice on the grounds that they violated the separation of powers in important respects, threatened judicial independence, and opened the way to political pressure on the judiciary.
In June, 237 military personnel serving sentences after convictions for coup-plotting in the Sledgehammer case were released from prison after the the Constitu- tional Court ruled that they had not had a fair trial and ordered retrials. Defendants in the Ergenekon trial whose convictions were under appeal were bailed in March when pretrial detention was cut from 10 to 5 years.
Combating Impunity
Great obstacles remain in securing justice for victims of abuses by police, mili- tary, and state officials. In April 2014, the government introduced a law giving immunity from prosecution to personnel of the National Intelligence Agency (Milli İstihbarat Teşkilatı, MİT), unless the agency itself expressly authorizes prosecution. This measure, which is incompatible with Turkey’s human rights ob- ligations, creates a risk that intelligence personnel might be immune from ac- countability for serious human rights violations committed during their duties, including torture. At time of writing, the law was under appeal before the Consti- tutional Court.
Despite thousands of killings and disappearances of Kurds by state officials in the 1990s, only a handful of trials of officials have taken place. The 20-year statute of limitations on the prosecution of unlawful killings remains a major ob- stacle to justice and many cases risk being timed out without urgent action to address it. Stronger efforts to combat impunity are vital to support the Kurdish peace process.
In June, a military court upheld a decision of non-prosecution in the case of the attack by the Turkish Air Force in December 2011 that killed 34 Kurdish villagers near the village of Roboski (Ortasu) close to the Iraqi Kurdistan border. An ap- peal by the families of the victims to the Constitutional Court was pending at time of writing.
Few investigations were concluded into police violence and disproportionate use of force against demonstrators during the May-June 2013 Gezi protests around the country. In a July 2014 communication to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the right to freedom of assembly (regarding the Oya Atman group of cases), the Turkish government claimed that after the countrywide Gezi protests, 329 criminal investigations into the police had been launched in 13 provinces, of which 59 had resulted in decisions of nonprosecution, 6 in prose- cutions, and the remainder were still pending.
A police officer who shot dead Ethem Sarısülük in June 2013 during an Ankara protest received an eight-year sentence for “probable intent to kill.” There were delays in the trials of police and civilians charged with killing demonstrators Ali İsmail Korkmaz and Abdullah Cömert. Decisions in these cases to transfer the tri- als to locations at significant distance from the place of the crime disadvantages the families of the victims and their lawyers. At time of writing there was an on- going investigation into police for the shooting with a tear gas canister of 14- year-old Berkin Elvan who died in March after nine months in a coma.
The retrial of a group of young men for the January 2007 murder of journalist Hrant Dink continued. In July, the Constitutional Court ruled that the murder in- vestigation had not been conducted in an effective manner.
Refugees
As of October 2014, according to official estimates, Turkey was hosting 1.6 mil- lion refugees from Syria, 220,000 in camps and the remainder in urban areas, as well as around 80,000 mostly Afghan asylum seekers and refugees from other nationalities.
A new asylum law, which went into effect in April 2014, maintains Turkey’s geo- graphical limitation to its accession to the Refugee Convention but, for the first time, enshrines asylum and subsidiary protection as a matter of law, including provisions for legal aid, on unaccompanied children and on nonrefoulement. It limits administrative detention of migrants pending deportation to six months (extended for another six months for noncooperation) with the stipulation that detention ordinarily should not be used for asylum seekers.
Key International Actors
The European Union, EU member states, and the United States expressed con- cerns about Turkey’s record on Internet freedom, judicial independence, and moves to undermine the rule of law, while commending Turkey for hosting over one million refugees from the war in Syria.
The European Commission in its annual progress report released in October commended the Turkish government’s moves to put the Kurdish peace process on a legal footing, advised that full revision of the 1982 constitution constitutes “the most credible avenue for advancing further democratization of Turkey,” and raised “serious concerns” about government interference in the judiciary follow- ing corruption allegations and blanket bans on Twitter and YouTube.
There was no progress in the EU accession process. An EU readmission agree- ment with Turkey came into force in October, allowing EU governments to return Turkish citizens residing in the EU without authorization to Turkey, and after a three-year transition period permitting the EU to return irregular migrants from other countries to Turkey in cases where it is established that they entered the EU via Turkey.
Among the European Court of Human Rights rulings against Turkey in 2014, a September decision on religious education classes (Mansur Yalçın and Others v. Turkey) found that when it comes to compulsory religious instruction, the Turkish education system is still inadequately equipped to ensure respect for parents’ convictions because of the overwhelming emphasis on Sunni Islam. The court ruled that, without delay, Turkish authorities had to permit pupils the right to be exempt from religion and ethics classes without requiring a reason.
In September, the Turkish government announced that it would sign two Interna- tional Labour Organization (ILO) conventions (nos. 167 and 176) on safety and health in mining and construction. The May 13 mining accident at the Soma mine in western Turkey in which 301 miners died highlighted that Turkey has one of the world’s worst records on fatal accidents in the mining and construction in- dustries, lacks effective oversight and inspection to ensure safety and work con- ditions, and has a poor record of holding companies accountable for accidents.
Foreign Policy
The conflicts in Syria and Iraq had a growing impact on Turkey, particularly in the wake of the June 2014 consolidation of power by ISIS when it occupied large swathes of Syria and Iraq and took hostage Turkey’s Mosul consul general and 48 consular staff and their family members. Turkey managed to secure their re- lease in September. The Turkish parliament voted in October to grant the Turkish government wide-ranging powers to intervene militarily in Syria and Iraq.
Turkey’s approach to Syria primarily advocated the overthrow of the Assad gov- ernment, viewing the US coalition focus on combating ISIS as inseparable from that aim.
As prime minister, and now president, Erdoğan has consistently and publicly criticized the Egyptian government of Abdel Fattah al-Sisi since it deposed Presi- dent Mohamed Morsy in 2013. Turkey’s stance on Egypt has reduced its ability to influence powers in the Middle East supportive of the Sisi government.
Turkey was a strong critic of Israel’s military operations in the Gaza Strip in July- August and diplomatic relations between the two countries remain limited. There was no normalization in relations with Armenia and their shared border re- mained closed.

'Gone with the Wind' - Turkey's $7.9 Billion Mystery Money That's Simply Vanished.


'Gone with the Wind' - Turkey's $7.9 Billion Mystery Money That's Simply Vanished. (Bloomberg).

Something bizarre is happening on Turkey’s accounting books, and nobody’s quite sure why.

Turkey attracted $7.9 billion of income from unexplained sources during the first eight months of 2014, compared to an outflow of $90 million during the same period a year ago, according to the central bank data. In the three months that followed, $5.6 billion of that left the country.


“There is no way to predict what is going to happen to these flows in 2015,” Mehmet Besimoglu, chief economist at Oyak Menkul Degerler, said by phone from Istanbul.

Besimoglu has his theories about the source of money and why it leaves. Inflows might be linked to capital flight from Iraq and Syria, where the advance of the Islamic State has pushed more than around 1.5 million people across the border to Turkey. Outflows tend to take place during periods of lira appreciation, he said. Read the full story here.





Related? Iran Targets Turkey Gold Trader Over Oil $ 2,7 Billion, Lawmaker Says


Turkey Crisis Puts Jailed Millionaire at Heart of Gold Trail

Monday, January 26, 2015

CHP deputy chairman: 'Turkey is experiencing its darkest period, nearing final stage of dictatorship'


CHP deputy chairman: 'Islamist' Turkey is experiencing its darkest period, nearing final stage of dictatorship. (TodaysZaman).

CHP deputy chairman: Turkey nearing final stage of dictatorshipMain opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) parliamentary group deputy chairman Levent Gök has warned that Turkey is moving toward a very dark future, saying that Turkey is about to reach the final stage of dictatorship.

Gök said Turkey is nearly in the final stages of dictatorship, adding that this final stage is a process that is being dragged into conflict deliberately.Stating that freedoms are not cheap, as people risk their lives to acquire them, Gök said: “It seems that Turkey will continue to pay the price for this. Turkey is in a very dark stage,” adding that Turkey is experiencing a period during which a government which used democracy to come to power is declaring its dictatorship.

Gök, who said everyone has the responsibility to prevent the formation of a dictatorship, added: “We are in a period in which the [Justice and Development Party] AK Party is trying to construct its own judiciary, police force and armed forces using laws. If this period is not stopped in the 2015 elections, Turkish democracy will suffer severe damage.”

Saying that the government is trying to silence democrats, Gök asked the audience to protect and support artists and intellectuals who attended the ceremony at Cologne University.

Referring to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's recent trip to Africa and his efforts to push African countries to close Turkish schools affiliated with the Gülen movement, Gök stated that a president should know his place, and that his responsibility is symbolic. “I believe that the public conscience will rise against corruption and pressure and will teach the AK Party a lesson to [in this year's elections].”

Also speaking at the event was a columnist for the Cumhuriyet daily, Can Dündar, who said that he, as a journalist, is walking in a minefield in Turkey. “Today, it is forbidden to call a thief a thief in Turkey. However, there is corruption on a grand scale. We all see this. The voice of a person who cries ‘There is a thief!' is being silenced. The prosecutors who say [there is corruption] and police officers who capture [the thieves] are being detained. The journalists who write about this [corruption] are intimidated by lawsuits. Gag orders are being issued to silence the media and event Parliament is being silenced.”

CHP deputy Durdu Özbolat also said recently that Turkey is experiencing its darkest period, and that the government is redesigning Turkey, including its universities, judiciary, army, media and even business world, in order to remove the basic values of the Turkish Republic. Hmmm.......Remember Erdogan feels at home in Iran. Read the full story here.

Ankara 'court': Access to Facebook to be partially blocked in Turkey.


Ankara 'court': Access to Facebook to be partially blocked in Turkey. (Taz).

The access to Facebook will be partially blocked in Turkey in accordance with the decision of Ankara court, Milliyet newspaper reported on Jan.26.

Moreover, it is expected that the access to a number of Facebook accounts, which propagate hatred against Islam and insult Islamic values, will also be blocked in the country.

It was reported on Jan.14 that the access to several social networks, including to Twitter and Facebook will be blocked in Turkey. Reportedly, this decision will be taken due to the online spread of materials about stopping Turkish intelligence service trucks in the country’s Adana province in 2014.

Earlier, Turkish Minister for Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications Lutfi Elvan said that access to the Internet can be blocked in Turkey without a court decision if required for national security interests.

Elvan said that the ministry will be authorized to temporarily restrict Internet access and block access to the mentioned sites if materials that can harm national interests are revealed there.

Turkey previously blocked known websites for security concerns in 2014. Under a court decision, Turkey blocked Twitter on March 21, 2014.

Another popular service Youtube was blocked on April 5, 2014, when an audio recording of a secret meeting on the situation in Syria was uploaded to YouTube on March 27, 2014.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...